Provision Registry

402 classified provisions across 299 platforms — browse, filter, and compare.

Every clause classified by type, severity, and platform. Updated as policies change.

Start Compliance free trial Track specific clauses across platforms with provision-level alerts.
Filtering: Legal jurisdiction × Clear all
medium Legal jurisdiction
Reddit · Reddit User Agreement
The governing law and jurisdiction clause determines the substantive legal rules applied to interpret the agreement and establishes the forum in which legal proceedings must be initiated, affecting dispute resolution procedures and applicable statutory frameworks.
CA-P-000721 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Snowflake · Snowflake Terms of Service
The governing law and exclusive venue clauses determine where and under what legal framework disputes must be litigated, which may create logistical and financial barriers for customers located outside California and may interact with mandatory local law protections in other jurisdictions.
CA-P-011320 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Comcast · Comcast Terms of Service
The clause establishes the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, requiring that any court proceedings occur in a specific geographic jurisdiction under a specific state's substantive law, which determines applicable legal standards and procedural rules.
CA-P-001712 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Box · Box Terms of Service
Users outside California who need to pursue legal action against Box face the added burden and expense of litigating in California courts under California law, which may be impractical for individual users or smaller businesses.
CA-P-009299 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Peacock · Peacock Terms of Use
The selection of governing law determines which state's substantive legal rules apply to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement, establishing New York law as the controlling legal framework regardless of the user's location.
CA-P-001802 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 17, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Patreon · Patreon Terms of Use
Requiring disputes to be litigated in California courts effectively raises the cost and difficulty of pursuing legal action for users located outside California, which may discourage legitimate claims.
CA-P-000967 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Walmart · Walmart Terms of Use
The clause establishes the legal framework for interpreting the agreement and designates the procedural mechanism and venue for dispute resolution, which determines how contractual disagreements are addressed and which substantive law applies to the terms.
CA-P-003607 First tracked Apr 27, 2026 Last seen Apr 27, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Plaid · Plaid Terms of Use
The clause specifies the legal framework applicable to the agreement and establishes the exclusive forum for dispute resolution outside of arbitration, which determines venue and procedural law for any litigation.
CA-P-000939 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 27, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Anyscale · Anyscale Terms of Service
The governing law selection determines which substantive law applies to contract interpretation and performance obligations, while the jurisdiction clause establishes the venue and forum for litigation of non-arbitrable disputes, affecting where proceedings must be filed and conducted.
CA-P-004978 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Gusto · Gusto Terms of Service
The clause designates a specific jurisdiction and governing law for dispute resolution, which determines which courts have authority to hear non-arbitrated claims and which state's substantive law applies to contract interpretation and enforcement.
CA-P-005068 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Replit · Replit Terms of Service
The governing law selection establishes the substantive legal framework applicable to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement, while the exclusive jurisdiction clause concentrates litigation authority in a specific geographic venue, determining which courts have authority to hear non-arbitrable disputes.
CA-P-004281 First tracked Apr 30, 2026 Last seen Apr 30, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Groq · Groq Terms of Use
The clause specifies the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, establishing California as the controlling jurisdiction and San Francisco County courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitrated claims, which defines the procedural and substantive law applicable to the agreement.
CA-P-004339 First tracked Apr 30, 2026 Last seen Apr 30, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Khan Academy · Khan Academy Terms of Service
Being required to litigate in California courts may be impractical for users in other states or countries, effectively creating a geographic barrier to legal recourse even when arbitration does not apply.
CA-P-002869 First tracked Apr 18, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Mixpanel · Mixpanel Terms of Use
The clause standardizes the legal framework applicable to the agreement and centralizes dispute resolution in a specific geographic forum, eliminating the possibility of litigation in courts located in other jurisdictions where either party operates or is domiciled.
CA-P-005728 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
McDonald's · McDonald's Terms of Use
This mechanism operates as a binding acceptance framework, converting passive continued use into contractual assent to any revisions McDonald's makes to its terms. It establishes the procedural basis for enforceability of the full agreement against all users accessing the website.
CA-P-005736 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Chegg · Chegg Terms of Use
If you live outside California and a dispute proceeds to court rather than arbitration, you may need to litigate in California courts, which is costly and impractical for most users.
CA-P-001821 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Uber · Uber Terms of Use
This provision establishes the legal framework and venue applicable to disputes that proceed outside arbitration, including any claims by users who have opted out of the arbitration clause. The choice of Delaware law and California venue may affect the procedural rights available to users in other jurisdictions.
CA-P-006557 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Cohere · Cohere SaaS Agreement
The exclusive Ontario jurisdiction clause means enterprise customers outside Canada must litigate disputes in Canadian courts under Canadian law, which creates logistical, cost, and legal complexity for EU-based and US-based customers.
CA-P-011560 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Medium · Medium Terms of Service
The choice of law and venue provisions specify the legal framework and jurisdiction applicable to disputes, which determines which courts have authority to hear non-arbitrated claims and which substantive law governs contract interpretation and enforcement.
CA-P-005982 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Verizon · Verizon Terms of Service
The choice of law and exclusive jurisdiction clause creates a procedural framework that standardizes legal interpretation across disputes and centralizes litigation venue, reducing administrative complexity for dispute resolution administration.
CA-P-005999 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Meta · Meta Terms of Service
The exclusive California jurisdiction clause requires users outside California to litigate disputes in California courts, which may be practically prohibitive, though the consumer carve-out acknowledges that local law may apply for individual consumers in some jurisdictions.
CA-P-007083 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
DocuSign · DocuSign Terms and Conditions
If you need to take DocuSign to court for a matter outside arbitration, you would need to litigate in California, which may be impractical and costly for users located elsewhere.
CA-P-001049 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Zillow · Zillow Terms of Use
The clause specifies the legal framework and venue for dispute resolution, establishing Washington law as the substantive law governing the relationship and centralizing litigation in a specific geographic jurisdiction rather than allowing suits in other jurisdictions where users may be located.
CA-P-006688 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Postman · Postman Terms of Service
The clause designates a specific legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, establishing that all disputes must proceed through the San Francisco court system rather than courts in other jurisdictions where a user may be located.
CA-P-006787 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Grubhub · Grubhub Terms of Use
This governing law designation determines which legal standards and statutory requirements apply to the agreement's interpretation, performance obligations, and dispute resolution procedures. The reference to the Federal Arbitration Act establishes the federal legal framework for any arbitration proceedings and creates substantive enforceability standards for arbitration provisions.
CA-P-006071 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Meta · Meta Platform Policy
The clause designates a specific jurisdiction and governing law for all disputes, which determines the legal framework applied to interpretation and the venue where litigation must occur.
CA-P-003220 First tracked Apr 27, 2026 Last seen Apr 27, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Poe · Poe Terms of Service
The agreement designates California law and Santa Clara County courts as the exclusive forum for disputes that proceed outside of arbitration, which may create practical and financial barriers for users in other states or countries who wish to pursue legal claims.
CA-P-011825 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Tinder · Tinder Terms of Use
Non-US users attempting to bring a legal claim against Tinder may face procedural obstacles if the governing law and jurisdiction clause requires them to litigate in Texas courts under Texas law, though this assertion may not be enforceable in all jurisdictions.
CA-P-001211 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Synthesia · Synthesia Terms of Service
For customers based outside the UK, particularly in the EU or US, this clause requires any legal dispute to be pursued in English courts, which may be impractical and expensive, and may limit the applicability of local consumer or data protection remedies.
CA-P-004396 First tracked Apr 30, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Stability AI · Stability AI Terms of Use
The clause establishes the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, determining which substantive law applies to the interpretation of the agreement and specifying the exclusive venue for litigation.
CA-P-006351 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Monitor specific governance provisions across platforms.

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Start free Start Compliance free trial