This provision creates a mechanism through which Redfin can modify its contractual terms without requiring affirmative user consent. The binding effect attaches automatically through continued use rather than through explicit acceptance actions, establishing the procedural basis for term updates to take effect.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the service provider can unilaterally update binding contractual terms, with acceptance triggered by user conduct rather than affirmative agreement. The provision operationalizes ongoing modification of the agreement's scope and obligations.
The clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism that permits the service provider to alter contractual obligations without mutual agreement, subject to advance notice and potential acceptance requirements for material changes. This affects the stability and predictability of the contractual relationship over the service lifecycle.
The clause establishes Google's authority to alter contractual terms and pricing during the agreement period, with notice requirements that define the operational timeline for implementation of modifications.
This clause means the terms you agreed to when you signed up may change without your active consent, and simply using Grammarly after a change constitutes acceptance of whatever the new terms say.
This clause establishes the mechanism and conditions under which the contractual agreement between the user and Coinbase may be unilaterally altered by the service provider. It creates a procedural framework where modifications become binding through continued use rather than affirmative re-acceptance.
This provision establishes that Uber can update the contractual terms governing service use without obtaining affirmative re-consent from users, with continued use of the platform treated as acceptance. The mechanism by which users are notified of changes is described as posting on the website or app rather than direct communication.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which Equifax may change contractual obligations, service scope, and user rights without requiring mutual agreement. It operationalizes the company's authority to alter the binding terms governing the service relationship.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which Anyscale retains authority to alter the contractual relationship without requiring affirmative user consent. The provision designates website posting and date updates as the notification mechanism, making the terms dynamic rather than fixed upon initial acceptance.
Udemy
· Udemy Terms of Use
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which Udemy can unilaterally alter the contractual relationship with users. It creates an acceptance mechanism based on continued use rather than affirmative user consent, allowing term modifications to take effect without individual user action.
Users and enterprise customers who do not actively monitor the AI21 terms of service page may inadvertently accept significant changes to their rights, data use permissions, or liability exposure without explicit consent.
This clause establishes the operative mechanism by which the agreement terms may be updated without requiring affirmative user consent. It places the responsibility for monitoring changes on the user and creates a framework where silence following modification notice functions as acceptance.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which Twilio may unilaterally amend the contractual terms governing the Services without requiring separate affirmative consent from users. The operational significance lies in shifting the burden of term review to users and conditioning continued service access on acceptance of modified terms.
Lyft
· Lyft Terms of Service
This clause establishes the mechanism by which Lyft can unilaterally amend the contractual relationship with users. It designates continued service use as the acceptance mechanism for modified terms, creating a framework where the operative agreement may change during the term of the relationship.
Lime
· Lime Terms of Service
You may be bound by new terms you were not aware of simply by continuing to ride, unless you actively stop using the service after receiving a change notification.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which contractual obligations can be modified without bilateral agreement. It establishes that notice occurs through website posting and email notification, and that continued service access constitutes acceptance of modifications.
Vercel
· Vercel Terms of Service
This provision establishes Vercel's unilateral authority to alter service terms and availability during the contract period. It creates an asymmetric modification mechanism where the service provider can implement changes without requiring user consent, though notice is generally provided except for access restrictions.
Because ClickUp determines unilaterally what constitutes a material change warranting advance notice, users may not receive proactive notification of changes that meaningfully affect their rights or data practices.
This clause establishes the operational procedure by which the contractual agreement between Starbucks and users can be unilaterally altered without requiring affirmative re-acceptance, allowing the service provider to change governing terms throughout the relationship.
SoFi
· SoFi Terms of Service
This provision means that the terms governing your SoFi accounts and services can change over time without requiring your affirmative re-consent, and continued use of any SoFi product constitutes agreement to updated terms.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism for unilateral amendment of the service agreement, determining how changes to contractual obligations are implemented and when they take effect operationally.
Twitch
· Twitch Terms of Service
This clause establishes Twitch's authority to alter the contractual framework governing the service relationship without requiring mutual agreement or advance consent. It places the burden on users to monitor for changes and affirmatively discontinue service if they object to modifications, rather than requiring Twitch to obtain user approval for term changes.
You could be bound by new terms simply by continuing to use the service, even if you were not directly notified of the changes and did not actively review or consent to them.
This clause establishes the mechanism and conditions under which the service provider may alter contractual obligations. It addresses the operational requirement that modifications be communicated through specified notification channels.
Amazon
· Amazon Conditions of Use
This clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism under which updated terms take effect upon posting, with no affirmative acceptance required from users beyond continued use. Compliance teams should assess whether this mechanism satisfies affirmative consent requirements under applicable consumer protection and data protection frameworks.
Webull
· Webull Customer Agreement
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which Webull may unilaterally amend the contractual relationship without requiring affirmative consent from users. It places the burden on users to monitor for modifications and determine whether to continue service participation.
This clause means that material changes to user rights, data use, or other terms can take effect quickly, and continued use is treated as acceptance without requiring an explicit affirmative consent step.
Square
· Square Terms of Service
This clause establishes Square's unilateral authority to alter the contractual relationship and operational parameters of the service. It conditions continued service access on acceptance of modifications through continued use rather than affirmative consent.
This clause establishes the mechanism and notice procedures by which OpenAI may unilaterally update the contractual terms governing the service. It creates a binding effect through continued use rather than requiring affirmative acceptance of modifications.
Meta
· Meta Terms of Service
This provision operationalizes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship between Meta and users can be altered during the service period. It establishes notice and review procedures as the procedural safeguard for term modifications, while preserving Meta's authority to implement changes and tie their enforceability to user continuation of service.