This structure establishes the Terms of Use as a multi-document framework where enforceable provisions are distributed across region-specific pages rather than consolidated in a single document. Users must access the applicable regional terms to review the complete set of binding obligations and authorizations.
OpenAI
· OpenAI Usage Policies
This is a hard, unconditional restriction that applies to every user and operator without exception; violation would constitute both a policy breach and potentially criminal conduct under laws in most jurisdictions.
This provision establishes a foundational usage boundary that aligns the service terms with legal obligations under federal child protection statutes. The absolute prohibition structure removes discretion in enforcement and applies uniformly across all user categories and use cases.
This provision establishes a categorical content restriction that OpenAI enforces through its automated content moderation and compliance infrastructure. The prohibition aligns the service terms with applicable laws governing child sexual abuse material across jurisdictions where OpenAI operates.
Stripe
· Stripe Restricted Businesses List
This provision requires all Stripe users to represent, at the point of contracting, that their business does not fall within any prohibited category; a subsequent determination by Stripe that a business is prohibited can trigger account termination under the Services Agreement and may constitute a breach of the user's representations.
These prohibitions operate as hardcoded behavioral restrictions that define the scope of authorized service use. The provision establishes categorical exclusions from the service rather than content moderation applied post-hoc, thereby defining the baseline permissible use parameters for all users.
OpenAI
· OpenAI Usage Policies
This provision establishes use restrictions that apply irrespective of how users attempt to direct model behavior, creating binding operational boundaries on the service. The hardcoded nature of these prohibitions means they operate as non-negotiable constraints on permitted applications rather than guidelines subject to contextual judgment.
These use restrictions define the operational boundaries within which the service may be deployed. They establish that Customer bears responsibility for third-party conduct, that certain technical activities are prohibited, and that processing of Sensitive Personal Information requires prior written authorization from Amplitude as a prerequisite condition.
These restrictions define the outer boundary of permitted Bedrock use cases and carry account termination risk for violations; organizations providing Bedrock-based services to end users must ensure their downstream use cases comply with these restrictions.
The provision creates an ongoing compliance obligation tied to a policy document that Checkout.com may modify unilaterally. This structure allows the service provider to expand or modify restrictions on permitted use categories through policy updates rather than amendment to the primary terms.
PayPal
· PayPal User Agreement
This clause creates the operative mechanism by which the agreement becomes binding upon the user and establishes that PayPal may modify terms prospectively, with notice provided through designated channels rather than requiring affirmative re-acceptance.
Stripe
· Stripe Terms of Service
The provision establishes that acceptable use standards are defined by external, updatable documents rather than within the agreement itself, and grants Stripe unilateral authority to interpret and enforce compliance determinations. This structure allows Stripe to modify operational restrictions without amending the primary terms.
This provision places affirmative compliance obligations on the deploying organization rather than on DeepSeek, meaning that legal responsibility for lawful and non-harmful use of the model's outputs rests with the user or deploying entity.
These prohibitions apply to all licensees and flow downstream to end users of products built on self-hosted models, meaning deployers are responsible for enforcing these restrictions within their own platforms.
The provision functions as the operational framework governing user conduct and defines the boundaries within which the service may be accessed. It establishes the conditions under which Stability AI may suspend, restrict, or terminate access based on violation of stated use standards.
PayPal
· PayPal User Agreement
This clause operationally binds users to the full agreement framework upon account creation and maintains that binding effect through subsequent policy amendments. It establishes the mechanism by which PayPal's terms, fee structures, and operational policies become contractually enforceable.
The provision establishes operational conduct requirements for the platform and creates a mechanism for service suspension based on policy violation. Incorporation by reference makes the external Acceptable Use Policy binding and enforceable as part of the contractual agreement.
Vercel
· Vercel Terms of Service
The clause establishes Vercel's unilateral authority to police platform content without obligation to provide advance notice, explanation, or opportunity for user response. This operational discretion functions as a content governance mechanism that does not require Vercel to demonstrate violation of stated standards.
This provision establishes the operational boundary for permissible content generation on the platform and allocates responsibility to the customer for monitoring and controlling content produced by end users of customer-built applications. Compliance requires customers to design application controls that enforce the policy restrictions.
The provision establishes the operational basis for collecting accessibility-related data including health information, with explicit consent as a procedural requirement. This framework allows the platform to process sensitive data categories that would otherwise require heightened safeguards, subject to market-specific validation requirements.
Account or console suspension can result in the permanent loss of access to an entire digital library of purchased content, potentially representing significant financial loss with no refund mechanism described.
This provision asserts SIE's authority to suspend or permanently terminate both account and console access, with the consequence that users may lose access to previously purchased digital content. The scope of content access loss upon suspension is operationally significant given the digital-goods nature of PlayStation Store purchases.
This provision means users cannot exercise a standalone right to delete their Threads data and profile without also losing their Instagram account and all associated data, which may affect how users evaluate deletion as a practical option.
The provision creates an operational dependency between the two services, establishing that Threads account persistence is contingent upon Instagram account maintenance. This reflects the architectural relationship between the platforms and defines the scope of independent account management available to users.
The clause operationalizes subscription management as distinct from account management, requiring users to navigate separate cancellation procedures. This affects how subscription billing obligations persist after account-level actions.
This clause establishes that the license grant to Luma AI operates independently of account status. Once content is incorporated into Luma's systems or aggregated data before deletion, the termination of the user account does not retroactively revoke Luma's rights to continue using that previously-incorporated material.
The clause establishes that account deletion does not retroactively revoke intellectual property licenses for content that has already been processed and integrated into Luma's operational systems or datasets prior to the deletion event.
This provision establishes that the account deletion right does not function as a complete data rights mechanism where Input has already been used in model training or aggregated data. The operational scope of this carve-out depends on Luma's internal data pipeline timelines, which are not disclosed in the document.
This provision directly limits the practical effect of account deletion as a privacy remedy, meaning users cannot fully remove their content's influence from Luma's AI systems even after closing their account.
Cursor
· Cursor Terms of Service
This provision establishes the operational consequence of payment method failure at renewal—account deletion becomes an authorized remedy rather than requiring notice, cure period, or advance warning. The liability waiver means users cannot recover damages for account deletion conducted under this clause's authorization.