Provision Registry

402 classified provisions across 299 platforms — browse, filter, and compare.

Every clause classified by type, severity, and platform. Updated as policies change.

Start Compliance free trial Track specific clauses across platforms with provision-level alerts.
Filtering: Legal jurisdiction × Clear all
low Legal jurisdiction
Messenger Kids · Messenger Kids Terms of Service
The governing law and jurisdiction clause determines which substantive legal rules apply to the agreement and which forum handles dispute resolution. This affects the procedural requirements, remedies available, and interpretive standards applied to the terms.
CA-P-000587 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
SoFi · SoFi Terms of Service
This provision establishes the legal framework under which disputes would be evaluated, which is operationally relevant for determining which consumer protection statutes and substantive rights apply to claims arising from SoFi's financial services.
CA-P-006965 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Mailchimp · Mailchimp Standard Terms of Use
This provision designates Georgia courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitrable disputes, which may require users outside Georgia to litigate in a distant forum and limits the applicability of more consumer-protective state laws that might otherwise apply to users in their home jurisdictions.
CA-P-012209 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Target · Target Terms and Conditions
Designating Minnesota law as governing means consumers from other states, particularly those with stronger consumer protection laws like California, may find that the choice-of-law clause limits application of those protections, though courts in consumer's home states do not always honor such designations.
CA-P-010278 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
OpenRouter · OpenRouter Terms of Service
This provision establishes the legal framework and forum for all disputes not subject to arbitration. The California governing law designation engages California consumer protection statutes, including the CCPA, as potentially applicable to all users regardless of their geographic location.
CA-P-012774 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
GitHub · GitHub Terms of Service
This clause establishes the legal framework under which the agreement is interpreted and enforced, and designates the specific courts responsible for adjudicating disputes. It prevents parties from pursuing claims in other jurisdictions or under other governing law principles.
CA-P-009326 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
OpenSea · OpenSea Terms of Service
This provision requires users outside of New York to submit to New York court jurisdiction for non-arbitrated disputes, which may create practical barriers to litigation for users located in other U.S. states or internationally.
CA-P-012550 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Together AI · Together AI Terms of Service
This provision establishes California law as the governing framework and requires court proceedings to be filed in San Francisco County, creating a geographic requirement that may affect users located outside California who need to pursue court-based remedies.
CA-P-012978 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Indeed · Indeed Terms of Service
Requiring litigation in Texas creates a practical barrier for users outside Texas who want to pursue claims in court, effectively raising the cost and complexity of any legal action not resolved through arbitration.
CA-P-007647 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Gusto · Gusto Terms of Service
Employer-customers outside California who have disputes not covered by the arbitration clause must litigate in California courts, which may be impractical or expensive for businesses in other states.
CA-P-007970 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Fastly · Fastly Terms of Service
The governing law and venue selection mechanism determines which jurisdiction's substantive law applies to the agreement and restricts the geographic location where disputes must be litigated, which affects procedural costs and applicable legal standards.
CA-P-005008 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Acorns · Acorns Terms of Service
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive law applies to disputes, contract interpretation, and liability allocation under the agreement. This choice affects the legal framework through which the terms are construed and enforced.
CA-P-006726 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Terms of Use
Governing law provisions establish the legal framework for interpreting contractual obligations and resolving disputes. By designating Delaware law, Netflix establishes a consistent legal standard for all users regardless of location, while the carve-out for mandatory state consumer protections ensures that local statutory protections remain enforceable.
CA-P-003910 First tracked Apr 28, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Terms of Use
The governing law designation means that in the absence of conflicting mandatory local law, disputes are interpreted under Singapore law, which may differ from the law a user's home country would apply.
CA-P-002275 First tracked Apr 5, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Account and Content Policies
The governing law designation determines which jurisdiction's legal framework applies to interpretation and enforcement of the terms. The carve-out for mandatory consumer protections means that protections under a user's local law that cannot be waived contractually remain enforceable notwithstanding the Singapore law designation.
CA-P-000360 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 12, 2026 Compare across platforms →
NotebookLM · Google Generative AI Terms
This provision establishes a layered agreement structure where the generative AI terms govern in cases of conflict, meaning users of NotebookLM are subject to both the standard Google Terms of Service and these additional terms, and should review both documents to understand the full scope of their agreement.
CA-P-011911 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Max · Max Terms of Use
Language accessibility of terms determines the extent to which non-English speakers can access the full text of their contractual obligations. This provision has operational significance for how the company communicates the scope and limits of the service agreement across its user base.
CA-P-001774 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Roblox · Roblox Privacy Policy
This provision creates a hierarchy within the policy document that makes the regional addenda operative for users in covered jurisdictions, which is relevant to assessing the effective rights of users in high-enforcement regions such as the EEA and California where the addenda may confer rights beyond or different from the general policy.
CA-P-012805 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Garmin · Garmin Terms of Use
A single disclaimer page deployed across dozens of jurisdictions may not satisfy all applicable local legal requirements for accuracy disclosures, consumer protection, or data privacy in each market.
CA-P-008228 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Gemini · Gemini User Agreement
The NMLS registration disclosure serves an operational governance function by making users aware of Gemini's regulatory licensing status and the compliance framework under which the entity operates. This disclosure establishes transparency regarding the regulatory oversight applied to the platform's money transmission or financial services activities.
CA-P-000547 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Mistral AI · Mistral Terms of Use
Partners building on Mistral's platform are subject to distinct contractual obligations that may affect how they can use, distribute, or monetize Mistral's AI capabilities within their own products.
CA-P-004925 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Max · Max Terms of Use
The breadth of regional coverage means Max is subject to a wide range of consumer protection and data privacy regimes, and users in each region should review their specific terms rather than assuming uniform protections apply.
CA-P-009738 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
X · X Ads Master Services Agreement
The index structure establishes that X's advertising MSA is administered through jurisdiction-specific documents rather than a single global agreement, meaning that the operative contractual terms, including governing law, payment conditions, and dispute resolution, vary by the advertiser's applicable region.
CA-P-012539 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Max · Max Terms of Use
The terms that govern your rights as a Max subscriber, including cancellation, data use, and dispute resolution, depend entirely on which regional document applies to your location.
CA-P-009776 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google Gemini · Google Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy
This provision establishes the legal hierarchy between the general Google Terms of Service and the Gemini-specific policy, clarifying that Gemini-specific restrictions take precedence in any conflict.
CA-P-011360 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Account and Content Policies
The governing law clause establishes the substantive legal framework for interpreting the agreement and resolving disputes. The carve-out for mandatory consumer protection laws means that jurisdictional protections required by the user's home country remain operative regardless of the Singapore governing law designation.
CA-P-002191 First tracked Apr 4, 2026 Last seen Apr 9, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Netflix · Netflix Terms of Use
The governing law selection determines the legal framework for interpreting the agreement and resolving disputes. The preservation clause ensures that mandatory consumer protections in a user's jurisdiction of residence remain applicable despite the Singapore law designation.
CA-P-000340 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 18, 2026 Compare across platforms →
YouTube Kids · YouTube Kids Privacy Notice
This conflict resolution clause means that the child-specific protections in this notice, such as the prohibition on interest-based advertising and the parental consent requirements, govern over any broader permissions that might otherwise apply under Google's general Privacy Policy.
CA-P-008536 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Mailchimp · Mailchimp Standard Terms of Use
This provision permits Mailchimp to alter the contractual terms governing platform access on fourteen days' notice for standard changes and with no advance notice for legally required or functional changes, which may affect ongoing business obligations built around current terms.
CA-P-012206 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
low Legal jurisdiction
Salesforce · Salesforce Terms of Service
Visitors to the Salesforce website are subject to website-specific terms of service that are separate from the customer product agreements, and these terms may include provisions governing intellectual property, acceptable use, and dispute resolution applicable to all site visitors.
CA-P-007659 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Monitor specific governance provisions across platforms.

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Start free Start Compliance free trial