Max provides separate terms of use documents for different countries and languages, and this page lists links to each of those regional versions.
This analysis describes what Max's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The provision documents Max's regional localization structure for its governing terms. This reflects the operational practice of maintaining jurisdiction-specific and language-specific versions of the agreement to accommodate different regulatory environments and user populations.
Consumers in different countries are subject to materially different terms, and this page does not itself disclose what those terms say. Users must follow the link for their specific country and language to understand their actual contractual rights.
Cross-platform context
See how other platforms handle Regional Terms Directory and similar clauses.
Compare across platforms →Monitoring
Max has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"North America English Español Latin America & Caribbean English Español Português Europe Albania - English Armenia - Pусский язык - English ... United Kingdom - English Asia Pacific Australia - English ...— Excerpt from Max's Max Terms of Use
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The existence of over 50 jurisdiction-specific terms documents signals that Max has structured its terms to engage national and regional legal frameworks separately, including GDPR for EU/EEA users, UK GDPR for United Kingdom users, and US state and federal consumer protection law for North American users. The FTC and State Attorneys General are relevant enforcement authorities for US-facing terms, while national data protection authorities are relevant for European versions. No specific articles can be confirmed without reviewing each regional document. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Low. This provision is a navigation index and does not itself create contractual obligations. However, the fragmented structure creates moderate compliance exposure for organizations that need to ensure Max's terms satisfy their own vendor assessment or data processing requirements, since no single document covers all jurisdictions. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA and United Kingdom users face heightened exposure because GDPR and UK GDPR impose strict requirements on lawful basis for data processing, data subject rights, and cross-border data transfers, which the applicable regional terms may address differently. California residents should review the en-us terms for CCPA-specific disclosures and opt-out rights. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Organizations entering into commercial agreements with Max should confirm which regional terms apply to their agreement and whether those terms are incorporated by reference. The hub structure does not clarify which version governs in cases where a user's location is ambiguous or changes. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should maintain a record of which regional Max terms apply to their user population and monitor for updates to those specific documents. A single review of this hub page is insufficient for any substantive compliance assessment.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The provision documents Max's regional localization structure for its governing terms. This reflects the operational practice of maintaining jurisdiction-specific and language-specific versions of the agreement to accommodate different regulatory environments and user populations.
Consumers in different countries are subject to materially different terms, and this page does not itself disclose what those terms say. Users must follow the link for their specific country and language to understand their actual contractual rights.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Max.