Provision Registry

12505 classified provisions across 299 platforms — browse, filter, and compare.

Every clause classified by type, severity, and platform. Updated as policies change.

Start Compliance free trial Track specific clauses across platforms with provision-level alerts.
Shopify · Shopify Acceptable Use Policy
This provision creates an operational baseline that ties acceptable use obligations to the legal framework governing each merchant's jurisdiction, rather than establishing a single uniform standard. It allocates compliance responsibility to merchants based on their local legal environment.
CA-P-000833 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 17, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Strava · Strava Privacy Policy
Even aggregated or deidentified GPS data, particularly from users who regularly follow distinct routes, can in some cases be re-identified or used to infer sensitive location patterns; this feature has attracted national security and privacy scrutiny in the past.
CA-P-007785 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Max · Max Terms of Use
The provision operationalizes compliance with varying regulatory and legal requirements across different jurisdictions by maintaining separate, region-specific agreements. This structure allows Max to apply terms tailored to local legal frameworks, consumer protection standards, and language requirements in each geographic market.
CA-P-003799 First tracked Apr 28, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Hulu · Hulu Privacy Policy
This provision establishes Hulu's operational procedure for recognizing and processing opt-out signals from California residents exercising their statutory right to direct limitation of personal information sales or sharing under California privacy law.
CA-P-005207 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Verizon · Verizon Privacy Policy
GPC recognition provides a technical mechanism for California residents to opt out of data sharing for advertising without navigating the privacy choices portal, but the policy limits this recognition to California residents only.
CA-P-007057 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Target · Target Privacy Policy
Recognition of GPC signals as valid opt-out requests is required under CPRA regulations for businesses subject to CCPA/CPRA; this provision creates an operational obligation to implement technical GPC signal recognition consistently across all digital surfaces and to honor those signals within the 15-business-day response period.
CA-P-005829 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Verizon · Verizon Privacy Policy
This provision establishes Verizon's stated approach to automated opt-out signals, which is a compliance requirement under CPRA for California residents and under similar statutes in other states. The qualifying language 'where Verizon is able to do so' and 'for residents of states that require recognition' introduces scope limitations that compliance teams should evaluate.
CA-P-012463 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Verizon · Verizon Privacy Policy
This clause establishes an automated mechanism for opt-out requests, allowing users to communicate privacy preferences through standardized browser signals rather than requiring manual opt-out submission through Verizon's preference centers.
CA-P-003775 First tracked Apr 28, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Peacock · Peacock Privacy Policy
This clause establishes Peacock's operational procedure for processing opt-out preference signals transmitted through browser mechanisms. The provision conditions recognition on legal requirements, meaning the scope and implementation of signal recognition may vary by jurisdiction based on applicable data protection regulations.
CA-P-005075 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Shein · Shein Terms and Conditions
GPC signal honoring is required for businesses covered by the California Privacy Rights Act, and whether detection translates to operational suppression of data sharing is a material compliance question that this document does not resolve.
CA-P-007628 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 20, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Shein · Shein Terms and Conditions
Under CPRA regulations effective January 2023, businesses subject to California privacy law are required to treat a valid GPC signal as a consumer's opt-out of sale and sharing of personal information. This provision documents that the Shein platform has technically configured GPC signal processing, which is an operationally significant compliance mechanism for California-based users.
CA-P-012404 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Spotify · Spotify Privacy Policy
The provision creates a mechanism for users to communicate privacy preferences at the browser level rather than through account settings, while establishing that the effectiveness of such signals is contingent on continuous technical conditions. The requirement to renew preferences across devices or after cookie deletion reflects the technical architecture of preference signal implementation.
CA-P-007833 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Max · Max Privacy Policy
The global scope of WBD's services, including Max, means that personal data may be transferred across jurisdictions, and the protections available to any individual user depend on which regional policy and supplement apply to them.
CA-P-009722 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Fitbit · Fitbit Privacy Policy
A large number of Fitbit users have linked their devices to Google Accounts, meaning they are subject to a different and much broader privacy framework than what this document describes. Users may not realize which policy governs their data.
CA-P-001447 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Fitbit · Fitbit Terms of Service
Being subject to two overlapping sets of terms means Google's data practices, dispute resolution mechanisms, and policies also govern your Fitbit use, which may expand the scope of data sharing beyond what you might expect from a fitness device.
CA-P-010462 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Arlo · Arlo Terms of Service
The tracking implementation enables Arlo to measure service performance metrics, user engagement patterns, and advertising campaign effectiveness through Google's analytics infrastructure. This data collection supports operational analysis and marketing attribution reporting.
CA-P-005273 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Google Maps · Google Maps Platform Terms of Service
This provision means that the full Google Cloud Platform Terms, including liability limitations, indemnification obligations, and governing law provisions, apply to Maps Platform customers in addition to the Maps-specific restrictions, creating a layered contractual framework that compliance teams must evaluate in its entirety.
CA-P-012632 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google Ads · Google Ads Terms of Service
This provision authorizes inbound data flows from third parties (merchants, issuers) to Google, supplementing data collected directly from users. The reference to 'provide and improve its services' as a purpose may warrant evaluation under data protection frameworks that require specific and limited purposes for personal data processing.
CA-P-012111 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google Pay · Google Pay Terms
This means Google is not responsible for resolving purchase disputes, refund issues, or problems with goods and services purchased through Google Pay, which limits your recourse against Google when transactions go wrong.
CA-P-009961 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google Ads · Google Ads Terms of Service
This provision limits Google's stated contractual responsibility for transaction outcomes, refunds, and chargebacks, and directs dispute resolution to card issuers and merchants. The enforceability of these limitations may depend on applicable consumer protection and payment services regulations in specific jurisdictions.
CA-P-012112 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google AI Studio · Gemini API Terms of Service
The agreement reserves broad discretion to Google to modify or discontinue the service. Developers who have built production applications relying on specific API features should be aware that those features can be removed with no guaranteed minimum notice period, which has operational risk implications.
CA-P-011806 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google · Google Analytics Terms of Service
This provision establishes that Customer Data processed through Google Analytics may be used by Google to improve its own services and in connection with advertising services, which creates a direct operational dependency between the account holder's analytics implementation and Google's broader product and advertising ecosystem. Compliance teams should assess whether this data use permission is adequately disclosed in the account holder's own privacy policy.
CA-P-012639 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Google Pay · Google Pay Terms
This clause establishes Google's operational authority to unilaterally impose transaction delays based on its own assessment of fraud or policy compliance risk, without requiring advance notice, external verification, or specific criteria for the determination.
CA-P-006631 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Privacy rights
Google · Google Analytics Terms of Service
This provision discloses a specific operational practice whereby Google support personnel may access the account holder's Analytics account and its associated Customer Data using the account holder's credentials. Account holders should assess whether this level of access is consistent with their internal data governance policies and any applicable confidentiality or data access obligations.
CA-P-012644 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Privacy rights
Twilio · Twilio Privacy Notice
Google Tag Manager operates as a tag management system that can load and fire additional third-party scripts and pixels beyond those disclosed individually in the page source. The container GTM-5JLZ694 controls which additional data collection tools are deployed, and its full contents are not disclosed in the privacy notice page source.
CA-P-012280 First tracked May 20, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Arlo · Arlo Privacy Policy
Google Tag Manager acts as a container that can load any number of tracking scripts, including analytics, advertising, and remarketing tags, meaning the full scope of third-party data collection is controlled server-side and may change without visible notice to users.
CA-P-010053 First tracked May 11, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Shopify · Shopify Terms of Service
For merchants located outside Canada, Ontario governing law means Canadian legal standards and courts would apply to contractual disputes, which may differ from the consumer and business protections available in the merchant's home jurisdiction.
CA-P-011325 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
LinkedIn · LinkedIn User Agreement
The governing law provision determines which jurisdiction's substantive legal rules apply to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement terms, affecting how disputes are resolved and what statutory protections or obligations are available to each party.
CA-P-002597 First tracked Apr 9, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Replit · Replit Terms of Service
The California governing law and exclusive venue clause requires non-arbitration disputes to be litigated in California courts, which may be logistically and financially impractical for users located outside California.
CA-P-011168 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
AWS · AWS Customer Agreement
This provision requires that disputes be litigated in King County, Washington courts under Washington State law, regardless of the customer's location. Customers outside Washington State or outside the United States face logistical and financial barriers to pursuing litigation under these terms, which is operationally relevant for dispute resolution planning.
CA-P-013189 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Monitor specific governance provisions across platforms.

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Start free Start Compliance free trial