Provision record
AWS · AWS Customer Agreement · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Dispute Jurisdiction

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 267 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track AWS and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The agreement designates Washington State law as the governing law and establishes exclusive jurisdiction for disputes in state or federal courts in King County, Washington. This applies regardless of where the customer is located or where the dispute arises.

This analysis describes what AWS's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision requires that disputes be litigated in King County, Washington courts under Washington State law, regardless of the customer's location. Customers outside Washington State or outside the United States face logistical and financial barriers to pursuing litigation under these terms, which is operationally relevant for dispute resolution planning.

Interpretive note: The enforceability of the exclusive King County, Washington jurisdiction clause may vary for EU/EEA customers under GDPR, for customers in jurisdictions with mandatory local jurisdiction rules, and depending on which AWS contracting entity is applicable to the customer's agreement.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, any legal dispute with AWS must be pursued in King County, Washington courts under Washington State law. For customers located outside Washington or outside the United States, this may create practical barriers to dispute resolution in local courts under local law; however, applicable law in specific jurisdictions may affect the enforceability of exclusive jurisdiction clauses for local customers.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.

Instacart Medium

For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware

Plaid Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
The laws of the State of Washington, without reference to conflict of law rules, govern this Agreement and any dispute of any sort that might arise between you and us. Any dispute relating in any way to the Service Offerings or this Agreement will be adjudicated in any state or federal court in King County, Washington, and each party consents to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in those courts.

Excerpt from AWS's Customer Agreement

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The governing law provision designates Washington State law, which may interact with GDPR requirements for EU/EEA customers, as GDPR disputes involving data subjects' rights may be subject to EU supervisory authority jurisdiction …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
AWS Customer Agreement
Entity
AWS
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-013189
Document ID
CA-D-00674
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
d47cdab1b87d6e2d7a3e281b188bf79b9a58fa27aa15d164d0db5f091f4e9d80
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 05:59 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: AWS
Document: AWS Customer Agreement
Record ID: CA-P-013189
Captured: 2026-05-21 05:59:50 UTC
SHA-256: d47cdab1b87d6e2d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/aws/aws-customer-agreement/provision/CA-P-013189/governing-law-and-dispute-jurisdiction/
Accessed: Sept. 20, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AWS's Governing Law and Dispute Jurisdiction clause do?

This provision requires that disputes be litigated in King County, Washington courts under Washington State law, regardless of the customer's location. Customers outside Washington State or outside the United States face logistical and financial barriers to pursuing litigation under these terms, which is operationally relevant for dispute resolution planning.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, any legal dispute with AWS must be pursued in King County, Washington courts under Washington State law. For customers located outside Washington or outside the United States, this may create practical barriers to dispute resolution in local courts under local law; however, applicable law in specific jurisdictions may affect the enforceability of exclusive jurisdiction clauses for local …

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 267 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with AWS?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS.