Klaviyo
· Klaviyo Acceptable Use Policy
This provision creates a broad content standard that incorporates compliance with all applicable laws as a platform use condition, meaning regulatory violations in messaging campaigns may also constitute AUP violations subject to Klaviyo's enforcement authority.
Stripe
· Stripe Acceptable Use Policy
This provision establishes that users may not build upon, incorporate, or use any component of the End User Services as an input for the creation of third-party content, products, or services, which has direct implications for developers or users who might otherwise integrate End User Services functionality.
The provision creates a gatekeeping mechanism whereby Cohere retains approval authority over API access based on use case classification. This operational requirement allows the provider to screen for prohibited applications before service access is granted.
Minecraft
· Minecraft End User License Agreement
This clause establishes the licensor's control over derivative distribution channels and commercial exploitation of the licensed software and related content. It defines the scope of prohibited activities broadly to encompass direct distribution, monetization, and indirect access mechanisms, thereby reserving commercial and distribution rights to the licensor.
This provision establishes a content boundary for the service that restricts use cases related to electoral and political influence activities, and requires compliance with accuracy standards regarding factual representation in generated content.
This provision establishes OpenAI's operational boundary regarding political and electoral applications of its services. By categorizing influence operations as prohibited uses, the policy defines excluded use cases that the company does not authorize through its standard terms of service.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This provision operates as a usage boundary that protects AWS infrastructure and other customers from abuse vectors commonly associated with email and messaging systems. By defining prohibited practices, the clause establishes compliance obligations that customers must meet to maintain service access and creates operational standards for permissible use of AWS communication tools.
The provision operationalizes categorical restrictions on service access by defining prohibited user classes and use cases. This establishes enforcement parameters for the company's ability to restrict or terminate accounts that violate these categorical prohibitions.
This provision prohibits phishing-style site design and impersonation tactics used in certain affiliate fraud schemes. It extends beyond traditional website prohibitions to cover browser extensions and other digital products, reflecting the range of technical methods through which Amazon's brand and interface could be impersonated.
The provision establishes a limitation on the permissible use cases for the service by excluding financial advisory and securities trading functions. This framing clarifies Anthropic's regulatory status and defines the scope of activities for which the service is not designed or licensed.
Relying on Claude for investment decisions or financial advice is expressly prohibited and would be at your own risk, with no legal recourse against Anthropic for resulting financial losses.
This provision defines the scope of permissible use by establishing an exclusion from financial advisory and trading contexts. It establishes a foundational operational boundary regarding the regulatory status under which the service operates and the purposes for which output may be relied upon.
PayPal
· PayPal Acceptable Use Policy
The bribery and corruption prohibition covers both making and receiving corrupt payments, meaning the clause applies to both the payer and the payee in a corrupt transaction. The financial exploitation of a crime category is not further defined in the document, creating interpretive ambiguity about the scope of transactions captured.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This provision defines a category of conduct that AWS classifies as unacceptable use, which establishes the operational boundaries for what activities the service provider will permit on its infrastructure. The specification of prohibited deceptive practices creates a basis for enforcement action against accounts engaged in such conduct.
Klaviyo
· Klaviyo Acceptable Use Policy
This provision establishes a consent-based messaging standard that applies across all Klaviyo communication channels, including email, SMS, and WhatsApp, and creates an independent AUP violation ground for harassment-related conduct separate from anti-spam law compliance.
This clause establishes content standards that govern permissible user-generated expression within the Minecraft ecosystem, enabling the entity to enforce brand protection and community conduct expectations through content moderation mechanisms.
Shopify
· Shopify Acceptable Use Policy
This provision defines prohibited conduct on the platform and operates as an enforceability mechanism for Shopify to take action against content or behavior that violates these standards. The clause establishes the basis for account restrictions or termination when users engage in the specified activities.
xAI
· xAI Terms of Service
This restriction establishes a categorical boundary on permissible use cases for the platform by excluding applications where algorithmic outputs directly determine consequential outcomes for affected individuals without specified human review or intervention mechanisms.
This provision incorporates compliance with all applicable laws as a contractual obligation, meaning that any AI-generated output that violates law in the user's jurisdiction also constitutes a breach of these terms, creating dual exposure to both legal liability and account termination.
This provision establishes content restrictions that govern permissible use of the API service. The clause creates operational boundaries for what types of outputs and use cases the service may be applied to, requiring users to structure their applications to comply with these prohibited conduct categories.
OpenAI
· OpenAI Usage Policies
This clause defines prohibited conduct categories and establishes operational boundaries for service deployment. The restriction applies to a defined class of use cases involving deceptive or manipulative content generation, which affects permissible application architectures.
This prohibition covers a category of AI misuse that has attracted significant regulatory and legislative attention globally; developers who build such capabilities on Cohere's infrastructure face both policy breach and increasing legal exposure as AI-generated disinformation legislation develops.
This restriction is intended to prevent genetic data derived from 23andMe's services from being used to make insurance or employment decisions, which aligns with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act's protections, though enforcement of this contractual restriction depends on user representation at account creation.
The clause establishes categorical use restrictions that define the scope of authorized service access. These restrictions operate as conditions on the user's permission to use the platform and establish parameters for acceptable user conduct.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This clause establishes a contractual obligation that aligns AWS's acceptable use requirements with applicable intellectual property law, creating a binding constraint on permitted service uses within the agreement.
This provision places responsibility on users not to use Perplexity to generate infringing content, which is significant given ongoing legal uncertainty about AI-generated content and copyright law.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This clause establishes a contractual requirement that restricts certain categories of content and service offerings on the AWS platform, functioning as a use limitation tied to intellectual property compliance obligations.
This provision defines a category of restricted content that users may not generate through the service. It establishes an operational boundary on the types of outputs the platform will support, which affects the scope of permissible use cases.
Amazon
· AWS Acceptable Use Policy
This provision establishes operational boundaries for AWS infrastructure use by defining content and activity restrictions. The clause functions as a baseline security requirement that applies across all AWS services and is enforceable through AWS's ability to suspend or terminate service access for violations.
The agreement prohibits specific manipulative trading practices and states that Binance.US can immediately terminate accounts for violations, meaning users risk losing access to their accounts and held assets if their trading activity is determined to constitute manipulation.