This clause requires users to financially protect Robinhood from claims arising out of their use of the platform, which could expose users to liability for Robinhood's legal costs in disputes connected to their account activity.
This clause means that if a third party sues Anthropic because of something you did or submitted, you could be required to pay Anthropic's legal defense costs as well as any resulting damages.
This clause means that if your activity on Public.com results in a legal claim against the company, you could be personally liable for Public's attorney fees and damages, which can be substantial.
This provision requires users to bear the cost of defending Pinterest against legal claims arising from user content or conduct, which could create significant financial exposure for individual users whose content generates third-party claims.
This clause makes you financially responsible for Snap's legal defense costs if your actions on the platform give rise to third-party claims against the company, which could be significant.
Twitch
· Twitch Terms of Service
This clause creates potentially significant personal financial liability for ordinary users, not just commercial creators — for example, if a chat message or streamed content infringes a copyright or violates someone's privacy, you could be responsible for Twitch's legal defense costs.
Lyft
· Lyft Terms of Service
This clause means individual users can be held personally liable for Lyft's legal defense costs and damages in situations where a third party's claim against Lyft arises from the user's conduct, which can create significant unexpected financial exposure.
This clause could expose consumers to significant financial liability if their use of the platform results in third-party claims against Grubhub, including legal defense costs.
Indeed
· Indeed Terms of Service
This clause shifts significant legal and financial risk to users for conduct that Indeed determines violates its terms, potentially exposing users to liability for attorneys' fees and damages in disputes where Indeed faces third-party claims.
This provision establishes a broad indemnification obligation covering actual and consequential damages as well as attorneys' fees, extending to claims arising from third-party use of the user's account. Under this clause, users bear financial responsibility for defending Substack against third-party claims connected to their account activity even where the specific action was taken by another person using their credentials.
Figma
· Figma Terms of Service
This clause creates a broad financial obligation for users: if your use of Figma leads to a third-party claim against Figma, you are responsible for covering Figma's defense costs and any losses, which could be substantial.
This provision creates a broad indemnification obligation running from users to OpenSea, covering legal defense costs and damages for any claim arising from user conduct, including third-party IP and privacy claims. The scope extends to attorneys' fees, which may create significant financial exposure for users involved in any contested NFT transaction or content dispute.
This clause means that if another user sues Tinder over something you posted or did on the app, you could be responsible for Tinder's legal defence costs and any resulting liability, which could be substantial.
eBay
· eBay User Agreement
This provision places the cost of third-party claims against eBay arising from user conduct onto the user, including reasonable legal fees. The scope extends to eBay's affiliates, officers, directors, employees, and agents, and includes claims arising from law violations and third-party rights infringement.
This clause can expose individual users and enterprise customers to significant legal and financial liability if their use of AI21's platform generates third-party claims, including claims related to outputs produced by the AI itself.
Ancestry
· Ancestry Terms and Conditions
This indemnification clause is broad and could expose individual users to significant financial liability if their use of the service or content they upload results in legal action against Ancestry, which is a more expansive obligation than many users would expect from a consumer genealogy platform.
The indemnification clause shifts the responsibility to users to cover legal costs and damages that Anthropic may face in connection with user-generated activities, violations, or third-party claims. This provision allocates risk and liability defense obligations to users for certain categories of disputes and claims.
Box
· Box Terms of Service
This clause shifts significant legal and financial risk to users, meaning that if a third party sues Box because of how a user used the service, the user is responsible for covering Box's defense and any resulting losses.
This broad indemnification covers not just online activities but also physical activities related to prize events, meaning users take on personal legal and financial risk even when traveling to or participating in prize-related events organized by DraftKings.
This indemnification is broad and includes attorneys' fees, which means a legal claim arising from your event or content could result in significant personal financial exposure beyond the direct damages of the original claim.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
This clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to business users for defending Google against third-party claims related to the user's service use or breach of the agreement. The indemnification obligation encompasses both defense costs and liability exposure, creating a material cost obligation for business users.
This provision requires that users bear the cost of defending Klaviyo against third-party claims that originate from the user's platform activity, creating a direct financial obligation that extends beyond the user's own legal exposure.
Reddit
· Reddit User Agreement
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial risk to users for disputes stemming from their activities on the platform, requiring users to bear costs of Reddit's defense in such disputes rather than Reddit absorbing those costs directly.
Replit
· Replit Terms of Service
The indemnification clause establishes a procedural obligation whereby users assume financial and legal responsibility for defending Replit against third-party claims connected to the user's conduct. This shifts the cost of legal defense and potential damages from Replit to the user in specified scenarios.
This indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates legal defense and liability expenses to users for certain categories of disputes. The provision expands Snap's protection by making users responsible for defending the company against a broad range of claims connected to user conduct or user-generated content.
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume legal and financial responsibility for defending Tabnine against third-party claims related to user conduct, service access, or contractual breaches. This allocation of liability exposure operates as a material term governing the distribution of legal risk between the parties.
This clause can expose individual users and small creators to significant financial liability if their content triggers third-party legal claims, including copyright disputes or privacy violations, with costs that survive account closure.
Affirm
· Affirm Terms of Service
This clause shifts legal defense costs to you in the event your actions using the service result in claims against Affirm, which could be financially significant if a dispute escalates.
This indemnification clause is unusually broad, requiring users to cover all losses and expenses Character.AI incurs related to their use of the Services, including attorneys' fees, without any apparent cap or carve-out for situations where Character.AI is at fault.
The indemnification clause establishes a procedural allocation of legal and financial responsibility under which users assume defense costs and damages liability for claims connected to their service use, rather than FanDuel bearing those costs. This mechanism affects the operational relationship between the parties regarding claims origination from user conduct.