This analysis describes what Wyze's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Indemnifying Party will not settle any Claim for which it has an obligation to indemnify under this Section 6 admitting liability or fault on behalf of Indemnified Party, nor create any obligation on behalf of Indemnified Party without Indemnified Party's prior written consent...
Customer must provide us with prompt written notice of any Claim Against Customer and allow us the right to assume the exclusive defense and control...
The party seeking indemnity...must give the other party...the following: (i) prompt written notice of any claim...,(ii) all cooperation and assistance reasonably requested by the Indemnitor in the defense of the claim...and (iii) sole control over the defense and settlement of the claim...
"if you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to Wyze for certain costs and damages.Excerpt from Wyze's Terms of Service
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “if you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to Wyze for certain costs and damages.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 228 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Wyze.