This provision establishes the mechanism by which the contractual obligations governing the service relationship can be altered without requiring affirmative consent from users. It defines the procedural requirements (notice and review opportunity) that apply when material modifications are made.
This provision enables the service operator to alter contractual obligations, service scope, data practices, and dispute resolution procedures without requiring affirmative user agreement or opt-in. The operational consequence is that the governing terms governing the relationship are subject to unilateral change rather than mutual modification.
This clause establishes OpenAI's authority to unilaterally alter the contractual obligations, restrictions, and authorizations that govern the service relationship. The provision operationalizes how changes to the governing agreement become effective without requiring affirmative user consent.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which the contractual relationship can be modified without negotiation. It shifts the burden of responding to term changes to the user, as non-action results in automatic acceptance of new terms.
This provision establishes the operational mechanism by which the service provider may modify contractual obligations during the term of service. The clause creates a framework where service modifications become binding upon continued use rather than requiring separate affirmative consent to each amendment.
Twilio
· Twilio Terms of Service
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism through which Twilio may revise contractual obligations and service terms, with notice requirements creating a structured interval for users to review changes before they become effective. The provision addresses how contractual modifications bind parties in an ongoing service relationship.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which Snapchat may alter the contractual obligations, rights, and conditions governing service provision. It shifts the burden of affirmative rejection to users while establishing notice requirements scaled to the materiality of proposed changes.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which the agreement can be updated without requiring affirmative user consent, with notice requirements for material modifications. It sets the procedural baseline for how term changes are communicated and when they become binding.
Yelp
· Yelp Terms of Service
This clause establishes Yelp's unilateral authority to alter contractual terms without requiring advance user consent or opt-in. It establishes that the governing terms are the versions in effect at each moment of service access rather than the version accepted at initial signup.
DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
This clause establishes the procedural framework through which the contractual agreement between DocuSign and users can be modified without individual renegotiation. The provision conditions continued access to services on acceptance of updated terms through a notice-and-continued-use mechanism rather than requiring explicit affirmative consent.
Spotify
· Spotify Terms and Conditions
This clause establishes Spotify's operational authority to alter the service scope and content catalog without contractual obligation to notify users or provide alternative remedies. It allocates to Spotify the discretion to make changes necessary for technical maintenance, regulatory compliance, or product evolution without triggering liability exposure.
This clause establishes the operational framework governing term modifications and service access continuity. It designates the website as the authoritative source for current terms and establishes continued use as the acceptance mechanism, while reserving unilateral authority to modify service availability without notification requirements.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which the agreement terms may be modified during the service relationship. It creates a procedural requirement that changes be prospective rather than retroactive, and establishes discontinuation of service as the remedy available to users who object to modifications.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which Wise may alter the contractual terms governing the service. The operational significance depends on the notice, effective date, and user opt-out provisions detailed in Section 25, which would determine how amendments take effect.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which the contractual framework governing the service relationship can be modified without mutual agreement, conditioned on notice and a continued-use acceptance model rather than affirmative consent.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which Shopify can alter the contractual agreement without requiring affirmative user consent. It places the obligation to monitor for changes on the user rather than requiring Shopify to provide direct notice of substantive modifications.
This clause establishes 23andMe's unilateral authority to amend contractual terms and sets the operational procedure by which modifications take effect. It creates a framework where continued service use constitutes acceptance of revised terms rather than requiring affirmative consent to amendments.
This clause establishes TaskRabbit's authority to alter the contractual framework governing the service without requiring advance mutual consent. The provision specifies that amendments take effect upon publication, creating a mechanism by which service terms can be changed during the ongoing relationship between the parties.
Microsoft
· Microsoft Services Agreement (Legacy)
This clause establishes the mechanism by which contractual terms can be updated unilaterally, with notification serving as the procedural requirement rather than user consent. It creates an operational framework where service terms remain dynamic rather than fixed at initial acceptance.
Webull
· Webull Customer Agreement
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which the agreement's terms can be altered post-execution. It eliminates the requirement for mutual consent or advance notice prior to term modifications, concentrating modification authority solely with the service provider.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which contractual terms governing the service relationship may be updated without requiring mutual agreement. It conditions the applicability of modified terms on user notification and a notice period rather than affirmative consent to each revision.
The clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism that permits the service provider to alter governing terms without requiring user consent or separate agreement, with notice as the sole procedural requirement.
Meta
· Meta Terms of Service
The clause operationalizes Meta's ability to alter contractual obligations prospectively while establishing user notification as the procedural mechanism for communicating changes. It preserves Meta's discretion to implement modifications while providing users with an explicit opt-out mechanism through account deletion.
Fitbit
· Fitbit Terms of Service
The clause creates a procedural mechanism for unilateral amendment of the agreement terms while requiring advance notification and providing a review opportunity. It establishes that assent to modified terms occurs through continued use rather than affirmative signature or acknowledgment.
TikTok
· TikTok Terms of Service
This clause establishes the procedural framework through which the agreement terms may be altered during the service relationship, creating a mechanism for TikTok to adjust contractual obligations while maintaining a notification requirement that permits users advance awareness of changes before implementation.
The clause establishes a mechanism for updating contractual terms without requiring explicit user consent, relying instead on continued use as acceptance. This creates an operational framework where the terms governing the service relationship may change during the user's tenure.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter contractual terms during the account lifecycle while providing a defined notice period and cancellation window. This structure addresses how modifications to service policies are implemented and communicated across the user base.
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter the contractual terms governing the service relationship while creating a procedural safeguard through advance notice and cancellation rights for material changes. It also permits organizational restructuring through assignment or transfer without requiring separate user consent.
The clause establishes Netflix's authority to amend contractual terms prospectively while creating a structured notice-and-exit window for users to reject material modifications. It also permits assignment of the service agreement to third parties, which affects the contractual counterparty and party responsible for service delivery.
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter contractual terms during the membership period while imposing a notice requirement and grace period for user response. The provision creates a procedural framework for ongoing contract modification rather than fixing terms at initial signup.