This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which Adyen may alter the contractual relationship with merchants, including modification of service terms, fees, obligations, and conditions. The thirty-day notice period creates a defined timeframe during which merchants may review proposed changes prior to their operative date.
This provision means the terms governing your use of OpenAI services can change, and continued use after notification constitutes acceptance, even if you did not affirmatively review or agree to the updated terms.
This clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism whereby the service provider retains authority to alter contractual terms during the agreement's term, with acceptance triggered by continued use rather than explicit user affirmation.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism through which the governing terms can be altered without mutual agreement. The operational significance lies in Mercury's authority to modify service terms on a unilateral basis, with the scope of advance notice dependent on Mercury's own materiality determination.
Terms changes can affect your rights, the license you grant to Ideogram, and your dispute resolution options, and continued use is treated as acceptance without requiring your explicit agreement.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual agreement between OpenAI and users can be altered without requiring affirmative re-consent. It places the burden of notice on the provider and ties acceptance to the user's continued service use rather than explicit agreement.
This clause establishes the operational framework through which the agreement's terms may be altered without requiring mutual consent or affirmative re-acceptance, allowing the service provider to modify contractual obligations on an ongoing basis. The provision defines notice methods and the acceptance mechanism, creating a procedural structure for term amendments throughout the service relationship.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism and conditions under which the service provider may unilaterally alter the contractual agreement. It specifies the notice methods required and establishes that acceptance occurs through continued use rather than explicit affirmative consent.
Whoop
· Whoop Terms of Use
This clause establishes the procedural framework governing how the contractual terms between Whoop and users may be unilaterally altered. The provision's operational significance lies in the notice period requirement for material changes and the company's retained authority to define materiality, which determines when the extended notice period applies.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which the governing agreement can be updated without separate affirmative consent, creating a system where the operative terms may change during the course of the user relationship. The mechanism ties acceptance to continued use rather than explicit acknowledgment, making the modification process dependent on user behavior rather than affirmative action.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
This provision establishes the procedural framework governing how contractual obligations may be altered during the service relationship. It creates two distinct modification pathways: standard modifications with notice and opportunity to review, and expedited modifications in specified categories without advance notice requirement.
The unilateral modification provision means the terms users agreed to at sign-up can change, and continued use of the service is treated as acceptance of any updated terms, which may include changes to data practices, fees, or dispute resolution.
This provision establishes the mechanism by which 23andMe retains ongoing authority to alter contractual obligations without requiring affirmative user consent before changes take effect. The operational significance is that the agreement terms governing the service relationship are non-static and subject to modification at the entity's discretion.
Pika
· Pika Terms of Service
This clause establishes the operational framework under which the terms of service remain dynamic rather than static. It allocates to Pika the authority to modify the agreement unilaterally, with the exception of dispute resolution provisions, which are subject to a notice-based limitation on retroactive application.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter contractual terms during the account lifecycle while providing a defined notice period and cancellation window. This structure addresses how modifications to service policies are implemented and communicated across the user base.
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter the contractual terms governing the service relationship while creating a procedural safeguard through advance notice and cancellation rights for material changes. It also permits organizational restructuring through assignment or transfer without requiring separate user consent.
The clause establishes Netflix's authority to amend contractual terms prospectively while creating a structured notice-and-exit window for users to reject material modifications. It also permits assignment of the service agreement to third parties, which affects the contractual counterparty and party responsible for service delivery.
This clause establishes Netflix's authority to alter contractual terms during the membership period while imposing a notice requirement and grace period for user response. The provision creates a procedural framework for ongoing contract modification rather than fixing terms at initial signup.
There is no stated obligation for Craigslist to notify users of changes, meaning the terms governing your use can materially shift without your active awareness, and continued use constitutes binding acceptance of whatever the new terms say.
This gives Google broad, unilateral authority to withhold or delay payments you initiate, which could affect time-sensitive purchases or payments, with no defined process for challenging the decision.
Users should understand which banks receive their uninvested cash, the applicable FDIC coverage limits across program banks, and any money market fund risks, as these affect the safety and accessibility of idle funds.
Unity
· Unity Terms of Service
Continued use as deemed acceptance means developers who do not actively review and respond to term change notifications may find themselves bound by materially different obligations without explicitly agreeing to them.
The Privacy Policy governs how Mistral AI collects, uses, stores, and shares your personal data across all of its services, making it one of the most consequential documents for all users.
This provision clarifies that privacy settings, Stealth Mode, and content deletion do not remove content from the scope of guideline enforcement, meaning Midjourney retains the ability to review and act on content regardless of its visibility status.
These are the baseline rules that apply to every single user, and enforcement can happen without advance notice, meaning access can be suspended at Anthropic's discretion.
GitHub
· GitHub Acceptable Use Policies
This provision establishes a broad prohibition on unlawful content that supplements the specific categorical prohibitions elsewhere in the AUP, and its broad framing means that the scope of prohibited content depends on applicable law in the user's jurisdiction, which may vary significantly across geographies.
This prohibition addresses the use of AI to enable invasive personal tracking, including applications designed to covertly monitor individuals' communications, location, or activity without consent.
This provision prohibits using Vercel's infrastructure for spam or phishing campaigns, which is a standard AUP requirement and aligns with applicable law, but the extension of account-holder responsibility to end-user conduct means account holders must ensure their deployed applications do not facilitate these activities by third parties.
This provision establishes specific operational timeframes for unsubscribe processing that users must build into their campaign workflows. Failure to maintain these timelines may constitute a policy violation subject to account enforcement.
Upwork
· Upwork Terms of Service
This structure means clients cannot be held responsible for non-payment if they already paid Upwork, and any payment disputes between freelancers and Upwork are separate from the client's legal obligation — potentially leaving freelancers without recourse against either party in a payment failure.