The indemnification clause establishes a mechanism by which Robinhood transfers certain legal and financial defense obligations to the user. This shifts responsibility for defending against specified claims to the user rather than retaining those obligations internally, affecting the allocation of legal risk between the parties.
This provision creates a financial obligation for users to cover Perplexity's legal costs and damages arising from user conduct or content submissions, including third-party claims. The scope extends to all content submitted through the platform.
This clause means that if a third party sues Duolingo because of something you did on the platform, you could be held responsible for Duolingo's legal defense costs, which could be substantial.
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates to users the financial responsibility for defending Nintendo against third-party claims connected to user conduct or content on the platform. This obligation applies regardless of fault determination and operates independently of other liability limitations in the agreement.
The indemnification clause establishes that users assume financial and legal responsibility for defending Pinterest against third-party claims connected to their use of the platform or content they post. This shifts certain liability exposure from Pinterest to the user.
The indemnification clause allocates financial and legal risk to users for third-party claims connected to their service use or contractual violations. This establishes DoorDash's ability to recover defense costs and damages from users rather than bearing those costs internally when claims arise from user conduct.
The indemnification clause means that if a third party sues LangChain because of how you used the platform or what you built with it, you may be required to cover LangChain's legal costs and damages, which can be financially significant for businesses.
This clause means you could be personally financially responsible for legal costs Poshmark incurs because of your activity on the platform, including if you unintentionally violate the terms.
Rumble
· Rumble Terms of Service
This provision requires users to bear the cost of defending Rumble against third-party claims arising from user conduct or content, including claims by third parties that user-uploaded content infringed their rights, which could create financial exposure for creators in the event of copyright or defamation disputes.
Canva
· Canva Terms of Use
This provision establishes that users bear financial responsibility for legal claims brought against Canva arising from the user's conduct, account activity, Terms violations, or user-generated content. The indemnification obligation extends to attorney's fees and applies to activity conducted by any person using the user's account credentials.
This provision requires users to cover Whatnot's legal defense costs and any resulting damages in claims arising from the user's platform activity, including content posted and any unauthorized use of platform features or content. The scope extends to claims brought by third parties arising from user conduct.
This indemnification clause allocates legal risk and defense costs to the Customer for claims arising from the Customer's data or service usage, establishing that Snowflake is not responsible for defending itself against such third-party assertions or bearing the financial consequences of resulting judgments.
The indemnification obligation extends to any third-party claims connected to the developer's use of the API, including intellectual property disputes and user-generated content issues, which can create open-ended financial exposure for developers.
The indemnification obligation allocates legal and financial risk to users by requiring them to assume defense costs and damages in specified categories of claims, rather than Verizon bearing those costs. This establishes a procedural mechanism for cost allocation in disputes involving user conduct or content.
DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
This provision shifts significant financial risk to users; if a dispute arises from how you use the service, you may owe DocuSign's legal fees in addition to any other liability.
This clause means that if a third party sues MetaMask because of something you did while using the service, you could be personally responsible for MetaMask's legal bills and any settlement or judgment, even if the outcome is uncertain.
A user indemnification obligation means that if a third party brings a claim against Stability AI based on how a user used the platform, the user may be contractually required to cover Stability AI's legal costs and any resulting liability.
Vercel
· Vercel Terms of Service
This indemnification clause allocates legal defense and liability costs to users for disputes involving their conduct on the platform. It establishes that users bear financial responsibility for defending Vercel against third-party claims related to their service usage or Terms violations.
The agreement states that users bear responsibility for indemnifying Binance.US against claims including attorneys' fees arising from their use of the platform, meaning users could be liable for significant legal costs if their conduct results in third-party claims or regulatory actions against the company.
Venmo
· Venmo User Agreement
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism whereby users assume legal defense obligations and financial responsibility for claims related to their service use, rather than Venmo bearing those costs directly. This allocation affects the distribution of legal and financial risk between the parties.
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to users for defending 23andMe against third-party claims connected to user conduct or service use. This establishes that users bear the cost of defense and damages in covered scenarios rather than 23andMe bearing those costs directly.
Indemnification obligations can require users to pay DoorDash's legal costs and damages if their conduct causes harm or legal claims against the company; the scope and conditions of this obligation are defined in the full text of Section 17.
Acorns
· Acorns Terms of Service
This indemnification clause establishes a cost-allocation mechanism whereby users assume financial responsibility for legal defense and liability costs incurred by Acorns related to user conduct, shifting certain legal and financial risk from the service provider to the user.
Figma
· Figma Terms of Service
This means that if your use of Figma, your uploaded designs, or a terms violation causes Figma to face a legal claim, you could be held financially responsible for Figma's legal fees and damages.
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates liability for third-party claims to users rather than to Dropbox, reducing Dropbox's financial exposure for disputes arising from user activities or content on the platform.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
This clause allocates legal defense costs and liability exposure to users for claims connected to their own violations or unlawful conduct, rather than requiring Google to bear those costs. The provision operates as a cost-shifting mechanism for third-party legal proceedings.
This indemnification obligation means that if your use of Ideogram exposes the company to third-party liability, such as through IP-infringing prompts or outputs, you could be financially responsible for Ideogram's legal defense and any resulting judgment.
Zoom
· Zoom Terms of Service
The indemnification clause establishes an obligation that allocates certain legal and financial responsibility to users for claims connected to their conduct or content. This shifts the burden of defending against and paying for claims in specified categories from Zoom to the user.
The clause allocates content liability to the user rather than Tinder, establishing that users assume financial responsibility for defending the platform against third-party claims connected to their submissions. This shifts the burden of legal defense and damages recovery away from the platform operator.
This clause could expose users to significant financial liability for Zillow's legal costs if their actions on the platform result in third-party claims, which is a substantial financial risk that most users are unlikely to anticipate.