Provision registry

Every clause, classified and comparable

936 classified provisions across 309 platforms, each clause typed by severity and platform. Browse, filter, and compare. Updated as policies change.

Stay ahead of the changes

Track specific clauses across platforms

Get provision-level alerts and cross-platform comparisons the moment a clause changes.

Filtering: Indemnification × Clear all
OpenAI · OpenAI Service Terms
(v) the claim alleges violation of trademark or related rights based on Customer's or its End Users' use of Output in trade or commerce
CA-P-064346 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
OpenAI · OpenAI Service Terms
(iv) Customer or its End Users did not have the right to use the Input or fine-tuning files to generate the allegedly infringing Output
CA-P-064344 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
OpenAI · OpenAI Service Terms
This indemnity shifts financial and legal exposure for intellectual property infringement claims arising from Output directly onto OpenAI rather than the API customer.
CA-P-064336 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
RapidAPI · RapidAPI Terms of Use
...(b) any breach of applicable laws, including but not limited to data privacy regulations...
CA-P-053992 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
RapidAPI · RapidAPI Terms of Use
...(c) any harm caused to other users of the platform through the misuse of the APIs or API Content/Terms.
CA-P-053994 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
RapidAPI · RapidAPI Terms of Use
API Providers agree to indemnify and hold Rapid harmless from any claims, penalties, or liabilities arising from such inaccuracies.
CA-P-054067 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Amazon Associates · Amazon Associates Operating Agreement
The clause places the financial burden of defending and satisfying claims on the associate, extending that obligation to a broad set of Amazon-related entities and individuals.
CA-P-064331 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Atlassian · Atlassian Cloud Terms
indemnify and hold harmless Customer against any damages, fines or costs finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction (including reasonable attorneys' fees) or agreed in settlement by Atlassian resulting from an Infringement Claim.
CA-P-056243 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Loom · Loom Terms of Service
indemnify and hold harmless Customer against any damages, fines or costs finally awarded by a court of competent jurisdiction (including reasonable attorneys' fees) or agreed in settlement by Atlassian...
CA-P-071932 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Atlassian · Atlassian Cloud Terms
Atlassian's duty to defend provides the customer with legal protection and defense costs coverage when a third party alleges that Atlassian's own products infringe intellectual property rights, but only to the extent the customer used them as authorized.
CA-P-056242 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Loom · Loom Terms of Service
This clause establishes a mandatory defense obligation on Loom's part, but it applies only to the extent the claim arises from authorized use, meaning use outside the agreement's authorization may not be covered.
CA-P-071931 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Loom · Loom Privacy Policy
Atlassian bears residual legal liability for its agents' data handling failures under the EU-U.S. DPF, shifting the burden to Atlassian to prove non-responsibility rather than requiring the affected individual to prove Atlassian's fault.
CA-P-052612 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Atlassian · Atlassian Privacy Policy
Atlassian remains liable under the EU-U.S. DPF Principles...if the Atlassian's agent processes personal information in a manner inconsistent with the EU-U.S. DPF Principles...unless the Atlassian proves that it is not responsible for the event giving rise to damage.
CA-P-057515 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
DocuSign · DocuSign Terms and Conditions
Docusign will indemnify you and your Affiliates...from, and defend the Indemnified Parties against, any actual or threatened third-party claim...to the extent arising from or related to: (a) any alleged infringement of any third-party intellectual property rights
CA-P-031740 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Airbnb · Airbnb Terms of Service
The indemnification obligation only applies if and to the extent that the claims, liabilities, damages, losses, and expenses have been adequately caused by your negligence or breach of a contractual obligation...
CA-P-022012 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Rumble · Rumble Terms of Service
If you receive payments from Rumble as the person authorized by the creator or rightsholder to retain Rumble as Agent, you indemnify and hold harmless Rumble from and against any claim by the creator or rightsholder...
CA-P-070184 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
AWS Bedrock · AWS Service Terms
This clause places the legal defense burden on AWS Bedrock rather than the customer when third-party IP claims arise from AI-generated output, which is a meaningful protection given the unresolved legal landscape around generative AI and copyright.
CA-P-052838 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
AWS · AWS Customer Agreement
AWS assumes both the defense burden and the financial obligation for third-party IP claims directed at its Services, shielding customers and their personnel from those costs.
CA-P-057495 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service
This commitment means the Customer is not left to bear the cost and burden of defending IP infringement claims that arise from Baseten's own products and services.
CA-P-073812 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service
Baseten will have no obligation under this section or otherwise with respect to any infringement claim based upon (i) any use of the Baseten Products & Services not in accordance with this Agreement...or (iv) any Customer Content...
CA-P-073814 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service
Baseten may, at Baseten's option: (a) procure for Customer the right to continue using the Baseten Products & Services; (b) replace the Baseten Products & Services with non-infringing software...or (d) terminate this Agreement and refund any unused prepaid Fees...
CA-P-073813 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service
Baseten will be liable for any breach of this DPA caused by a Sub-Processor to the extent Baseten would have been liable had such breach been caused by Baseten.
CA-P-073839 First tracked Jul 11, 2026 Last seen Jul 11, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Faire · Faire Terms of Service
Users bear personal financial exposure for any costs Faire or its corporate family incurs as a result of the user's breach, including legal fees and damages.
CA-P-068299 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Mercury · Mercury Terms of Service
The indemnification obligation is broad, covering any and all third-party claims and extending to Mercury's subsidiaries, agents, licensors, managers, and affiliated companies, potentially exposing users to significant financial liability.
CA-P-047419 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Mailchimp · Mailchimp Standard Terms of Use
This clause places financial responsibility on the user for a broad set of third-party or regulatory claims connected to their content or conduct, which could expose users to significant liability.
CA-P-065215 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Grindr · Grindr Terms of Service
The indemnification obligation is broad, covering any and all losses with no stated cap, and is triggered by anything arising out of or in any way related to a user's access or use.
CA-P-037632 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Yelp · Yelp Terms of Service
This clause places the financial burden of defending and resolving third-party legal claims on the user rather than Yelp, potentially exposing users to significant legal costs.
CA-P-035566 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Kick · Kick Terms of Service
The indemnification obligation is broadly worded to cover any and all claims, which means users could bear significant financial exposure for disputes involving Kick and its wide network of affiliated entities.
CA-P-061369 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Lime · Lime Terms of Service
This obligation means users bear the financial and legal burden of defending Lime's Released Parties against a broad range of claims connected to the user's own use of the services or products.
CA-P-063558 First tracked Jul 10, 2026 Last seen Jul 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Walmart · Walmart Terms of Use
The obligation covers all liabilities, claims, damages, costs, and expenses with no stated cap, meaning a user could face substantial financial exposure for misuse or breach.
CA-P-016734 First tracked Jul 9, 2026 Last seen Jul 9, 2026 Compare across platforms →
Stay ahead of the changes

Governance intelligence across platforms

Monitor specific governance provisions with regulatory mapping and audit-ready analysis.