Provision record
Baseten · Baseten Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Baseten Liable for Sub-Processor Breaches of DPA

Common · 224 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Baseten and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Baseten's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

Credit Karma

The Credit Karma Parties reserve the right, at their own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter subject to indemnification by you

Anyscale

The Indemnifying Party will have the sole right to conduct the defense of any Claim for which the Indemnifying Party is responsible hereunder, provided that the Indemnifying Party may not settle any Claim without the Indemnified Party's prior written approval unless...

Kling AI

In the event you are required to indemnify us pursuant to this Agreement or any court rulings, you must secure all necessary approvals and consents from regulatory authorities for the remittance of any indemnified amount to us.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Baseten will be liable for any breach of this DPA caused by a Sub-Processor to the extent Baseten would have been liable had such breach been caused by Baseten.

Excerpt from Baseten's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Baseten Terms of Service
Entity
Baseten
Date stated by the document
Sept. 15, 2026
As printed in Baseten’s text (version CA-V-007645), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
July 11, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-004731, captured July 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-073839
Document ID
CA-D-000813
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Extracted-text SHA-256 (version CA-V-004731)
fc18edee23c4c9909e45b313977ce7b9c30a17086fa9a27f6bf0dbda428e44df
Analysis generated
July 12, 2026 14:23 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-004731, captured July 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Not the current version. The document's current version is CA-V-007645, captured Oct. 16, 2026; this clause has not been re-checked against it.
Citation Record
Entity: Baseten
Document: Baseten Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-073839
Version: CA-V-004731
Captured: 2026-07-11 13:43:40 UTC
SHA-256: fc18edee23c4c990…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/baseten/baseten-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-073839/baseten-liable-for-sub-processor-breaches-of-dpa/
Accessed: Oct. 24, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Baseten's Baseten Liable for Sub-Processor Breaches of DPA clause do?

The clause states: “Baseten will be liable for any breach of this DPA caused by a Sub-Processor to the extent Baseten would have been liable had such breach been caused by Baseten.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Baseten?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Baseten.