This analysis describes what AWS Bedrock's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause places the legal defense burden on AWS Bedrock rather than the customer when third-party IP claims arise from AI-generated output, which is a meaningful protection given the unresolved legal landscape around generative AI and copyright.
The updated terms establish a new project-based account structure for new AWS sign-ups, requiring automatic disclosure of billing and project activity to team members and granting AWS authority to suspend or permanently close accounts if spend limits are exceeded. Project owners become responsible for the conduct of invited team members and the content they contribute, which becomes the project owner's property under a nonexclusive license shared with all project members. The terms also introduce spend limit controls that allow AWS to suspend access immediately and permanently close accounts if spending thresholds are repeatedly exceeded or if AWS determines the use is fraudulent or abusive. You can configure AI services opt-out policies through AWS Settings.
View change record →The updated terms establish that when AWS Bedrock customers direct AWS to access regulated data (such as personal data, protected health information, or controlled unclassified information) in a Professional Services Order, and applicable data protection laws apply, the AWS Professional Services Supplementary Data Processing Addendum is automatically incorporated. This means customers engaging AWS professional services with regulated data now have formal data processing protections and obligations defined in the DPA, rather than relying solely on the general prohibition against disclosing regulated data. The automatic incorporation clarifies the legal framework governing how AWS processes such data.
View change record →The updated terms establish explicit restrictions on how AWS IoT SiteWise Scenario Discovery may be used. The agreement now states that this service is not designed for real-time vehicle control, transmission of operational commands to vehicles, direct vehicle system integration, or regulatory submissions. Users are prohibited from relying on data collected or curated through this service as the basis for determining vehicle safety, compliance, or fitness for deployment. AWS is not responsible for any such uses. These restrictions clarify the intended scope of the service and establish that users bear full responsibility for any safety-critical applications.
View change record →Customers and their employees, officers, and directors are entitled to a defense from AWS Bedrock against third-party IP infringement or misappropriation claims tied to Generative AI Output from an Indemnified Generative AI Service.
How other platforms handle this
this Section 14 states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement covered by this Section 14.
We reserve the right, at our own expense, to assume the exclusive defense and control of any matter otherwise subject to indemnification by you.
THESE SECTIONS 9(B) AND 9(C) STATE RAMP'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE OBLIGATIONS, AND COMPANY'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES, WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT OR MISAPPROPRIATION OF THIRD-PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
"Subject to the limitations in this Section 50.10, AWS will defend you and your employees, officers, and directors against any third-party claim alleging that the Generative AI Output generated by an Indemnified Generative AI Service infringes or misappropriates that third party's intellectual property rights...Excerpt from AWS Bedrock's AWS Service Terms
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
This clause places the legal defense burden on AWS Bedrock rather than the customer when third-party IP claims arise from AI-generated output, which is a meaningful protection given the unresolved legal landscape around generative AI and copyright.
Customers and their employees, officers, and directors are entitled to a defense from AWS Bedrock against third-party IP infringement or misappropriation claims tied to Generative AI Output from an Indemnified Generative AI Service.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS Bedrock.