Zillow · Zillow Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Liability Cap at $100

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 1 of 325 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Zillow Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Even if Zillow causes you significant harm, the most you can recover from them in any legal proceeding is $100, unless you paid them more in the prior six months.

This analysis describes what Zillow's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This cap severely limits the practical financial remedy available to most users who have not paid Zillow directly, making it effectively impossible to recover meaningful damages even for significant harm caused by platform failures or data incidents.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the $100 cap varies by jurisdiction and may be limited by state consumer protection statutes that provide minimum statutory damages or prohibit waiver of statutory remedies.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

For most free users of Zillow's platform, the maximum financial recovery in any dispute is capped at $100, which may be inadequate to compensate for harms such as data breaches, erroneous property valuations relied upon in transactions, or other platform failures.

How other platforms handle this

Signal Medium

THE SIGNAL PARTIES WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY LOST PROFITS OR CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES RELATING TO, ARISING OUT OF, OR IN ANY WAY IN CONNECTION WITH OUR TERMS, US, OR OUR SERVICES, EVEN IF THE SIGNAL PARTIES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH...

Anthropic Medium

Except as stated in Section L.3.b, the liability of each party, and its affiliates and licensors, for any damages arising out of or related to these Terms (i) excludes damages that are consequential, incidental, special, indirect, or exemplary damages, including lost profits, business, contracts, re...

Fitbit Medium

TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF FITBIT, AND ITS SUPPLIERS AND DISTRIBUTORS, FOR ANY CLAIMS UNDER THESE TERMS, INCLUDING FOR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT YOU PAID US TO USE THE SERVICES (OR, IF WE CHOOSE, TO SUPPLYING YOU THE SERVICES AGAIN) DURING THE TWELV...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Zillow has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.

Start Watcher free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
IN NO EVENT WILL ZILLOW'S TOTAL LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ALL DAMAGES, LOSSES, OR CAUSES OF ACTION EXCEED ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) OR, IF GREATER, THE AMOUNT YOU HAVE PAID ZILLOW IN THE LAST SIX (6) MONTHS.

— Excerpt from Zillow's Zillow Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Liability caps in consumer contracts are generally enforceable under U.S. contract law, but are subject to limitations in jurisdictions where consumer protection statutes prohibit waiver of statutory remedies or establish minimum damages. The cap may face enforceability challenges if a harm falls under a state consumer protection statute that provides for statutory damages exceeding $100. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. A $100 liability cap is broadly used in consumer platform terms, but in the real estate context where users may rely on Zillow's Zestimate or listing data for major financial decisions, the adequacy of this cap relative to the potential scale of harm is noteworthy. JURISDICTION FLAGS: California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act and similar statutes provide for minimum statutory damages that could exceed the $100 cap, potentially rendering the cap unenforceable as applied to those claims. New Jersey and other states with strong consumer protection statutes may similarly limit the enforceability of low liability caps. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Real estate professionals or businesses using Zillow for lead generation or advertising may have negotiated separate commercial agreements with different liability terms; procurement teams should confirm which agreement governs their commercial relationship. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should assess whether the $100 cap is enforceable in all jurisdictions where Zillow operates, particularly for claims arising from data incidents, property valuation errors, or service outages that affect financial decisions, and whether the cap adequately covers indemnification obligations Zillow may face from third parties.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Watcher free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may have authority to challenge liability caps that conflict with state consumer protection statutes providing for minimum or statutory damages.
    File a complaint →
  • FTC
    The FTC may evaluate whether liability caps that effectively eliminate consumer remedies in consumer-facing digital platforms constitute unfair or deceptive practices.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Zillow Terms of Use
Entity
Zillow
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-010059
Document ID
CA-D-00231
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
5d71385f3f09129d73d0aba23f8d5b1024b58a8a4476f69b382a0fdf060a99d9
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 12:45 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Zillow
Document: Zillow Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-010059
Captured: 2026-05-08 12:45:03 UTC
SHA-256: 5d71385f3f09129d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/zillow/zillow-terms-of-use/liability-cap-at-100/
Accessed: May 13, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Professional Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Professional free trial

Or start with Watcher →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Zillow's Liability Cap at $100 clause do?

This cap severely limits the practical financial remedy available to most users who have not paid Zillow directly, making it effectively impossible to recover meaningful damages even for significant harm caused by platform failures or data incidents.

How does this clause affect you?

For most free users of Zillow's platform, the maximum financial recovery in any dispute is capped at $100, which may be inadequate to compensate for harms such as data breaches, erroneous property valuations relied upon in transactions, or other platform failures.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Zillow?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Zillow.