This analysis describes what Wise's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
For any dispute relating to this Agreement, the parties consent to personal jurisdiction and the exclusive venue of the courts in New York County, New York.
it shall be adjudicated exclusively by the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California.
Any dispute not subject to arbitration and not initiated in small claims court may be brought by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction in either the Superior Courts for the State of California...or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Monitoring
Wise has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"the state and federal courts in New York, New York will have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes (except for disputes brought in small claims court) that are not subject to arbitration...— Excerpt from Wise's Wise Terms of Use (Superseded URL)
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause states: “the state and federal courts in New York, New York will have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes (except for disputes brought in small claims court) that are not subject to arbitration...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Wise.