This analysis describes what Atlassian's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision allocates data governance responsibility to the administrator organization rather than Atlassian when accounts are accessed through an organizational context. It establishes that Atlassian's privacy obligations are limited to its own practices, while the organization's separate policies govern user data handling for administratively-controlled accounts.
Users whose accounts are administered by an organization must direct privacy inquiries to their administrator rather than Atlassian, and their data practices are governed by the administrator's policies rather than Atlassian's privacy statement. Users operate under a dual-policy framework where the administrator's policies take precedence over Atlassian's stated privacy practices.
How other platforms handle this
By submitting content to Indeed, including resumes, job applications, and other materials, you grant Indeed a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable, and transferable license to use, copy, modify, distribute, publish, and process that content in connection with operating and improving...
By submitting, posting, or displaying content on or through the Services, you grant Perplexity a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display, and distribute such content in any and all media...
SECTION 8 OF THIS AGREEMENT CONTAINS PROVISIONS RELATING TO OUR USE OF CERTAIN USER CONTENT.
Monitoring
Atlassian has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"If you use our products and services through an organization (e.g., your employer), that organization is the administrator of your account and is responsible for the accounts and/or service over which it has control. If this is the case, please direct your data privacy questions to your administrator, as your use of and data in our products and services is subject to that organization's policies. Atlassian is not responsible for the privacy or security practices of our customers, which may differ from those set forth in this privacy statement.— Excerpt from Atlassian's Atlassian Privacy Policy
Buried in Robinhood's customer agreement is broad authority to close your positions, suspend your account, and force arbitration. Here is what it actually says.
Stripe's terms authorize fund reserves, payout withholding, and account termination. Here is what the agreement states and what business owners should review.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision allocates data governance responsibility to the administrator organization rather than Atlassian when accounts are accessed through an organizational context. It establishes that Atlassian's privacy obligations are limited to its own practices, while the organization's separate policies govern user data handling for administratively-controlled accounts.
Users whose accounts are administered by an organization must direct privacy inquiries to their administrator rather than Atlassian, and their data practices are governed by the administrator's policies rather than Atlassian's privacy statement. Users operate under a dual-policy framework where the administrator's policies take precedence over Atlassian's stated privacy practices.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Atlassian.