Atlassian · Atlassian Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Controller versus Processor Distinction for Enterprise Accounts

High severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Atlassian Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

When you use Atlassian products through an employer or organization, that organization is typically the data controller and Atlassian acts as a processor, meaning your employer's privacy policies and the terms negotiated between Atlassian and your employer govern how your data is handled, not solely this policy.

This analysis describes what Atlassian's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision establishes that employees and contractors using Atlassian tools through an enterprise account may need to direct data subject rights requests to their employer rather than directly to Atlassian, and their employer's data governance practices apply to content within the account.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

For users accessing Atlassian services through an employer or organization, the employer administrator controls data processing decisions including retention, deletion, and access to content. Atlassian's direct data subject rights procedures may be limited in this context, as the employer is designated as the controller under the policy.

How other platforms handle this

Ledger Medium

At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.

Garmin Medium

If you are located in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, or the United Kingdom, you have the right to access, correct, or erase your personal data; the right to restrict or object to our processing of your personal data; the right to data portability; and, where our processing is based on your...

Strava Medium

We may display advertisements on our Services and those advertisements may be targeted to your interests based on your personal information. We may share your personal information with advertising partners for interest-based advertising purposes. You may opt out of interest-based advertising by visi...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Atlassian has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Atlassian is the controller of personal information covered by this Privacy Policy. In some instances, the customer (the 'administrator') decides how and why personal information is processed. In those instances, Atlassian is the processor of that information. The rights and obligations of customers who act as controllers are described in the agreements between Atlassian and those customers, including the Data Processing Addendum.

— Excerpt from Atlassian's Atlassian Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The GDPR's controller/processor framework under Articles 4, 24, and 28 requires a written Data Processing Agreement between Atlassian and enterprise customers acting as controllers. The UK GDPR imposes equivalent requirements. Regulators in the EU and UK may scrutinize whether DPA terms are adequate, particularly regarding sub-processor obligations and audit rights. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High for enterprise compliance teams. Organizations must ensure an executed Atlassian DPA is in place and that internal policies address how employee data within Atlassian environments is governed, including retention schedules and access controls. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK organizations have mandatory DPA requirements under GDPR Article 28. US organizations in regulated industries (healthcare, financial services) should assess whether additional agreements (BAA, financial data addenda) are required in addition to the standard DPA. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement teams should confirm the Atlassian DPA is executed and that the sub-processor list is reviewed and accepted. The DPA should address cross-border transfer mechanisms, incident notification timelines, and audit rights. Responsibility allocation for data subject rights requests (deletion, access) between Atlassian and the enterprise customer should be clearly documented. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Enterprise legal teams should map all categories of personal data processed within Atlassian tools, document Atlassian as a processor in their Article 30 records, and establish internal procedures for handling data subject requests that originate from employees using Atlassian products.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • State AG
    State attorneys general may have jurisdiction over employer data governance practices and consumer data rights for employees in states with comprehensive privacy laws.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Colorado AI Act
US-CO
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US
VPPA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Atlassian Privacy Policy
Entity
Atlassian
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011763
Document ID
CA-D-00708
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
8a1c5acb713e644f1bae9303aa9bc97bc64e447bd57ce9ec70ff0d9b296b971e
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 04:39 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Atlassian
Document: Atlassian Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-011763
Captured: 2026-05-08 04:39:00 UTC
SHA-256: 8a1c5acb713e644f…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/atlassian/atlassian-privacy-policy/controller-versus-processor-distinction-for-enterprise-accounts/
Accessed: June 27, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Atlassian's Controller versus Processor Distinction for Enterprise Accounts clause do?

This provision establishes that employees and contractors using Atlassian tools through an enterprise account may need to direct data subject rights requests to their employer rather than directly to Atlassian, and their employer's data governance practices apply to content within the account.

How does this clause affect you?

For users accessing Atlassian services through an employer or organization, the employer administrator controls data processing decisions including retention, deletion, and access to content. Atlassian's direct data subject rights procedures may be limited in this context, as the employer is designated as the controller under the policy.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Atlassian?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Atlassian.