Apple · Apple App Store Review Guidelines · View original document ↗

Anti-Steering Prohibition on External Purchase Links

High severity Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Apple Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Apps cannot include buttons, links, or messages that tell customers they can buy the same thing cheaper somewhere else — all digital purchase prompts must go through Apple's own payment system.

This analysis describes what Apple's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This clause establishes a standardized purchasing pathway requirement across the App Store ecosystem, directing all transactions through Apple's in-app purchase system. The prohibition on external purchase links and misleading pricing creates operational uniformity in how financial transactions and product information are presented to users.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 9, 2026

The updated guidelines state that developers must ensure kids receive age-appropriate experiences within their apps and must remove user-generated content that violates the guidelines, terms of service, or community standards. Under the revised policy, if Apple identifies policy-violating content, the developer will be asked to remove it and provide a compliance improvement plan. Based on the developer's response, the app may be removed from the App Store until compliance is demonstrated. This establishes a formal escalation pathway where developer inaction or inadequate remediation can result in app suspension or removal.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
3
Months Monitored
Apr 9, 2026
First Seen
Apr 10, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 912 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 3 months of monitoring.

Change history

removed Jun 9, 2026

Removal of this as a standalone high-severity provision (content merged into broader IAP requirement) reduces explicit emphasis on anti-steering and pricing transparency enforcement.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Consumers cannot be told within an iOS app that they could pay less for a subscription or digital content by purchasing directly from the developer's website, potentially costing them more money than necessary.

How other platforms handle this

Amazon Medium

You may not use the Services to: access or use any system without authorization; interfere with or disrupt the integrity or performance of any system, network, or data; or conduct or facilitate any security or vulnerability scan, penetration test, or similar assessment of third-party systems or netw...

Character.AI Medium

Avoid Professional Advice: Don't seek to receive or provide medical, legal, financial, or tax advice through the platform.

ConvertKit Medium

To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Apple has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
Apps and their metadata may not include buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms other than in-app purchase. Developers may not include misleading or inaccurate pricing information in their apps or metadata.

— Excerpt from Apple's Apple App Store Review Guidelines

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: This provision is the subject of a permanent injunction in Epic Games v. Apple (N.D. Cal., Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR) which held that Apple's anti-steering provisions violated California's Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200) and required Apple to allow developers to include external purchase links. The injunction is subject to ongoing compliance/contempt proceedings. The provision also engages EU DMA Art. 5(7) which prohibits anti-steering in the EU, enforceable by the European Commission.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    Anti-steering practices that prevent consumer price transparency may constitute unfair or deceptive acts under FTC Act Section 5, and the FTC has enforcement interest in App Store competition practices.
    File a complaint →
  • State AG
    The Epic v. Apple injunction was based on California's Unfair Competition Law; California AG and other state AGs have enforcement authority over unfair competition practices implicated by anti-steering.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Apple App Store Review Guidelines
Entity
Apple
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
March 6, 2026
Last verified
April 9, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-002425
Document ID
CA-D-00025
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
877541265fefdbebabcd1e30fe9651433f6b1dd3064ee4d811f9f9918e043f98
Analysis generated
March 6, 2026 20:15 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Apple
Document: Apple App Store Review Guidelines
Record ID: CA-P-002425
Captured: 2026-03-06 20:15:42 UTC
SHA-256: 877541265fefdbeb…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/apple/apple-app-store-review-guidelines/anti-steering-prohibition-on-external-purchase-links/
Accessed: June 18, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Apple's Anti-Steering Prohibition on External Purchase Links clause do?

This clause establishes a standardized purchasing pathway requirement across the App Store ecosystem, directing all transactions through Apple's in-app purchase system. The prohibition on external purchase links and misleading pricing creates operational uniformity in how financial transactions and product information are presented to users.

How does this clause affect you?

Consumers cannot be told within an iOS app that they could pay less for a subscription or digital content by purchasing directly from the developer's website, potentially costing them more money than necessary.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Apple?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Apple.