Character.AI's guidelines tell users not to use the platform to give or receive medical, legal, financial, or tax advice.
This analysis describes what Character.AI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision places an affirmative conduct obligation on users rather than simply disclaiming platform liability, and it may interact with FTC guidance regarding AI systems that provide consumer-facing advice in regulated domains.
Interpretive note: The practical enforceability of a user-facing prohibition against seeking advice, versus a technical platform control, is ambiguous and its effectiveness as a liability limitation may depend on jurisdiction and regulatory interpretation.
Users relying on Character.AI characters for health, legal, or financial guidance are instructed not to do so, and violation of this guideline could be used as a basis for account enforcement action under the platform's moderation powers.
How other platforms handle this
You may not use Runway's tools to create content that promotes, glorifies, or facilitates acts of terrorism, mass violence, or genocide, or that could be used to provide material support to individuals or organizations engaged in such activities.
Customer will not, and will not permit any other person (including any End User) to: ... (d) attempt to reverse engineer, decompile, or otherwise attempt to discover the source code or underlying components (e.g., algorithms, weights, or systems) of the Mistral AI Products, including using the Outpu...
You may not use the Services to attempt to circumvent, disable, or otherwise interfere with safety-related features of the Services, including features that prevent or restrict the generation of certain types of content.
Monitoring
Character.AI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"Avoid Professional Advice: Don't seek to receive or provide medical, legal, financial, or tax advice through the platform.— Excerpt from Character.AI's Character.ai Community Guidelines
REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The provision engages FTC authority over unfair or deceptive practices, particularly as applied to AI-generated advice in consumer health, finance, and legal contexts. State professional licensing laws may independently restrict the provision of medical, legal, or financial advice through automated systems. The FTC has issued guidance on AI endorsements and consumer-facing AI systems that may be relevant to how this prohibition is operationalized. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. Placing the prohibition on users rather than asserting an operational control is a notable structural choice. It shifts responsibility to users but does not describe how the platform technically enforces the prohibition, which may limit its practical effectiveness as a liability shield and could attract regulatory scrutiny if users demonstrably receive harmful advice through the platform. JURISDICTION FLAGS: Healthcare and financial advice prohibitions interact with sector-specific regulation in all US states and in the EU under frameworks governing medical devices, financial services, and legal services. The adequacy of a use-policy prohibition as a compliance mechanism for AI-generated advice is jurisdiction-dependent and may not satisfy regulatory obligations in certain sectors. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise customers in regulated industries (healthcare, financial services, legal) should note that this provision signals platform awareness of advice-related risks but does not describe technical controls preventing such outputs. Due diligence should assess whether the platform's AI models can in practice generate advice content despite this prohibition. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should evaluate whether this user-facing prohibition is sufficient to support a liability defense if the platform generates professional advice content, or whether additional technical and disclosure measures are required. The provision's practical enforceability against users is uncertain given the platform's AI character model capabilities.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision places an affirmative conduct obligation on users rather than simply disclaiming platform liability, and it may interact with FTC guidance regarding AI systems that provide consumer-facing advice in regulated domains.
Users relying on Character.AI characters for health, legal, or financial guidance are instructed not to do so, and violation of this guideline could be used as a basis for account enforcement action under the platform's moderation powers.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 2 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Character.AI.