The acceptable use restrictions place compliance responsibility on the user, which combined with the indemnification clause means users bear liability for harmful or infringing AI outputs even when such outputs may be partly attributable to the model's behavior.
Fly.io
· Fly.io Terms of Service
The clause defines the operational boundaries for permissible service use by restricting activities that could compromise service availability, security, or system integrity. The provision grants Fly.io discretionary authority to determine whether a load constitutes unreasonable or disproportionate usage.
This clause establishes operational boundaries for service use by specifying content generation restrictions that Together AI enforces through its platform controls. The provision creates enforceable contractual obligations tied to compliance with legal requirements and platform safety measures.
The provision defines the operational boundaries for service use by establishing affirmative restrictions on user conduct. These restrictions are designed to protect service infrastructure, prevent unauthorized access and data collection, maintain system security, and ensure compliance with legal requirements. The broad scope of prohibited activities serves as the contractual basis for enforcement actions or service termination.
This provision functions as a usage covenant that defines the scope of authorized service access and establishes operational boundaries for permissible user conduct. It provides contractual basis for enforcement actions and service suspension tied to violation of specified categories of prohibited activity.
Replit
· Replit Terms of Service
Violations of the acceptable use policy are stated as grounds for account suspension or termination, and the policy's scope directly determines what kinds of projects and code users can build and deploy on the platform.
The prohibition on using the Services to develop competing products or services is a notable restriction that goes beyond standard acceptable use terms and may affect developers working on AI-powered coding tools or related software.
The acceptable use restrictions define the conditions under which accounts may be suspended or terminated. Violations of these provisions are expressly listed as grounds for account termination under the discretionary termination clause.
This provision defines the boundaries of permissible platform use and establishes the contractual basis for account enforcement actions. API users and developers should note the prohibition on automated system access, which may interact with API-specific terms governing programmatic access.
Writer
· Writer Terms of Service
The clause defines the boundaries of permissible Service usage and establishes the contractual basis for Writer to enforce compliance through service suspension or termination. It allocates responsibility for legal compliance and intellectual property protection to the user.
This provision establishes Squarespace's enforcement mechanism for content moderation and network protection. By reserving sole discretion to determine violations, the clause creates a framework under which Squarespace can unilaterally enforce restrictions without requiring prior notice or independent review, which affects the operational predictability of platform access.
This provision establishes the content standards Teachable uses to evaluate whether creator content is permissible on the platform, and violations can trigger account suspension or termination under the termination clause. The prohibition on misleading or deceptive content is particularly relevant given FTC enforcement focus on online course and coaching marketing claims.
AWS
· AWS Customer Agreement
This acceptable use policy sets operational boundaries for service usage by defining activities and content types that are not permitted on the platform. The provision establishes AWS's contractual basis for enforcing conduct standards and potentially suspending or terminating access for violations, thereby maintaining the integrity and compliance posture of the service infrastructure.
Canva
· Canva Terms of Use
The clause defines the boundaries of authorized service use by specifying technical, security, and conduct-related restrictions. It serves to protect service infrastructure, user data, content integrity, and prevent unauthorized access or distribution of platform materials.
Venmo
· Venmo User Agreement
This clause defines the operational boundaries of the Venmo service by specifying transaction types and account uses that the platform does not permit. The provision establishes the basis for account enforcement actions and transaction restrictions.
Cohere
· Cohere SaaS Agreement
The AUP is incorporated by reference and may be updated by Cohere at any time, meaning the conditions of permitted use can change without the customer renegotiating the main agreement.
Immediate suspension without notice can disrupt business operations, particularly for customers who have built workflows or client deliverables that depend on platform availability, and the 'reputational risk' standard gives Synthesia broad discretion to act.
This clause establishes the procedural framework and conditions under which service suspension operates as an enforcement mechanism. It specifies the standard for suspension (reasonable belief of violation), the timing of notice obligations, and exceptions to pre-suspension notification based on protective necessity.
The acceptable use requirements are enforced at the enterprise customer level, meaning the company is responsible for ensuring all its employees comply. Immediate termination without a cure period for acceptable use violations could disrupt business operations significantly.
This clause establishes the operational mechanism by which Cloudflare may enforce compliance with its terms and policies, as well as respond to legal requirements or perceived harms. The provision grants the company discretionary authority to restrict service access based on its reasonable determinations regarding policy violations or harm prevention.
Slack
· Slack Terms of Service
The AUP incorporation creates enforceable operational standards for account use by reference, allowing Slack to maintain defined conduct requirements without restating all restrictions directly in the primary terms. This mechanism establishes the substantive rules against which account compliance is measured and against which violations may result in enforcement action.
Neon
· Neon Terms of Service
This provision establishes a compliance framework where the customer acts as the responsible party for all end-user conduct on the platform. By allocating enforcement responsibility to the customer rather than Neon, the clause creates a cascading accountability structure for policy violations originating from end-user activity.
The terms incorporate the AUP by reference and authorize Twilio to unilaterally update it, with continued service use constituting acceptance, meaning customers' obligations under the agreement can change without requiring affirmative re-consent.
This provision makes compliance with an external, modifiable policy a contractual obligation and establishes account termination as an enforcement mechanism. The incorporation by reference means users are bound by AUP terms even though they are maintained in a separate document that can be changed unilaterally.
This clause creates a binding compliance obligation tied to an external, mutable policy document. The unilateral amendment mechanism means the applicable use standards can change without separate notice or affirmative user acceptance, and enforcement is discretionary rather than limited to specified procedures.
Because the Acceptable Use Policy is incorporated by reference and can be updated unilaterally, changes to what Adyen considers acceptable business activity can alter your contractual obligations without a new signature.
This provision allocates operational responsibility and compliance oversight to the customer as the account holder, while establishing Atlassian's investigative authority. The assignment of end user conduct liability to the customer creates a framework where the customer functions as the responsible party for adherence to acceptable use standards across all account activity.
This provision allocates compliance responsibility to account holders as intermediaries, requiring them to implement contractual flow-down obligations to their end users. The mechanism creates a chain of contractual obligation intended to extend the Acceptable Use Policy protections to indirect users of the service.
AWS
· AWS Customer Agreement
The AUP is incorporated by reference and can be updated independently by AWS, meaning the conditions under which accounts may be suspended for policy violations can change without a formal amendment to the main agreement. Customers are responsible for ensuring their end users and content comply with the current version of the AUP at all times.
Fastly
· Fastly Terms of Service
Because the AUP can be updated without requiring explicit customer consent, customers may find themselves subject to new restrictions without direct notification, potentially affecting permissible use cases.