This analysis describes what Twilio's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
Twilio can act on a good-faith belief of a material AUP breach—not just a confirmed breach—to suspend services, and the suspension right extends to conduct by your End Users.
Interpretive note: The excerpt covers only subsection (a) of what appears to be a multi-part suspension provision. Additional grounds for suspension in other subsections are not captured in the canonical claim.
The updated terms establish a different dispute resolution process for customers domiciled or registered in Mexico. Previously, Mexico was subject to the standard arbitration venue clause routing disputes to San Francisco, California. Under the revised agreement, Mexican customers must first engage in good faith negotiations with Twilio's senior representatives for 30 days; if unresolved, disputes proceed to binding arbitration under Centro de Arbitraje de México (CAM) rules, conducted in English in Mexico City before a sole arbitrator. The agreement also explicitly states that Mexican consumer protection law (Ley Federal de Protección al Consumidor) does not apply to the commercial relationship between the parties. Mexico-domiciled customers should review the updated dispute resolution procedures and understand that consumer protection law carve-out before continuing use.
View change record →The updated terms establish two new regional service entities: CISA Telecomunicaciones for Mexico and Teravoz Telecom for Brazil, meaning customers in those jurisdictions will contract with the local entity rather than Twilio Inc. The agreement now permits orders to be placed through Twilio's online self-service purchasing workflow in addition to traditional written order forms, streamlining how purchase terms can be documented. The updated language also removes the prior commitment that Twilio will not materially decrease overall service functionality, replacing it with a general statement that services may change over time without specific protections on functionality levels.
View change record →The updated terms now route Twilio service agreements for Mexico and Brazil customers to new regional entities rather than Twilio Inc., which may affect service delivery, dispute resolution venue, and applicable local law. The definition of Order Form was expanded to explicitly include self-service online purchases, clarifying that terms negotiated through Twilio's account interface carry the same contractual weight as traditional executed agreements. The terms also removed language stating that Twilio would not materially decrease overall service functionality, replacing it with a simpler statement that services may change over time, which narrows the operational commitment Twilio makes regarding service stability. You can review the separate agreements that now govern your use based on your regional location.
View change record →Twilio may suspend your services upon written notice based on its good-faith determination or good-faith belief that you or your End Users have materially breached the Acceptable Use Policy.
How other platforms handle this
as required by law or at the request of governmental entities.
Failure to timely provide StockX or its partners with all relevant information may result in suspension of your account.
If the card information cannot be verified, is invalid, or otherwise not acceptable, we may suspend or cancel your access to the Services.
Monitoring
Twilio has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Twilio may suspend the Services upon written notice to you if Twilio, in good faith, determines: (a) that you or your End Users materially breach (or Twilio, in good faith, believes that you or your End Users have materially breached) the Twilio Acceptable Use Policy— Excerpt from Twilio's Twilio Terms of Service
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
Twilio can act on a good-faith belief of a material AUP breach—not just a confirmed breach—to suspend services, and the suspension right extends to conduct by your End Users.
Twilio may suspend your services upon written notice based on its good-faith determination or good-faith belief that you or your End Users have materially breached the Acceptable Use Policy.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 279 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Twilio.