Twilio updated its Terms of Service on May 9, 2026, making substantial changes to dispute resolution procedures for Mexico-based customers and removing arbitration provisions for Mexico from its general arbitration venue section. The agreement previously established arbitration venues for Japan; these provisions now apply to Mexico instead. For Mexico-domiciled customers, the updated terms replace mandatory arbitration in San Francisco with a 30-day good faith negotiation period followed by binding arbitration under Centro de Arbitraje de México rules in Mexico City, and explicitly exclude Mexican consumer protection law from applying to the commercial relationship.
The updated terms establish a different dispute resolution process for customers domiciled or registered in Mexico. Previously, Mexico was subject to the standard arbitration venue clause routing disputes to San Francisco, California. Under the revised agreement, Mexican customers must first engage in good faith negotiations with Twilio's senior representatives for 30 days; if unresolved, disputes proceed to binding arbitration under Centro de Arbitraje de México (CAM) rules, conducted in English in Mexico City before a sole arbitrator. The agreement also explicitly states that Mexican consumer protection law (Ley Federal de Protección al Consumidor) does not apply to the commercial relationship between the parties. Mexico-domiciled customers should review the updated dispute resolution procedures and understand that consumer protection law carve-out before continuing use.
The updated terms establish a different dispute resolution pathway for Mexico-based customers, requiring negotiation before arbitration and explicitly excluding Mexican consumer protection law. This change affects how commercial disputes are resolved and creates potential enforceability uncertainty around the consumer protection law carve-out. Organizations operating in Mexico should understand these revised procedures and evaluate whether the carve-out aligns with their legal status and compliance obligations.
→ Disputes will be resolved through CAM arbitration in Mexico City under the procedures and rules established in the updated agreement.
→ The agreement will be interpreted to exclude Mexican consumer protection law applicability, regardless of the customer's prior understanding.
ConductAtlas has recorded 3 material changes to this document (since April 2026). An additional minor or cosmetic changes were excluded.
3 of Twilio's significant changes have been classified as negative for consumers.
Establishes 30-day mandatory good faith negotiation followed by binding arbitration under CAM rules in Mexico City, with equal cost-sharing.
Explicitly states Mexican consumer protection law does not apply to the commercial relationship, with uncertain enforceability.
Removed Mexico from standard global arbitration venues; Mexico now subject to country-specific Section 10.5 procedures instead.
This change record describes what was added, removed, or modified in the document. Analysis reflects what the updated agreement states or permits. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Applicability may vary by jurisdiction. Methodology
Before filing for arbitration, Mexican customers must attempt to resolve disputes through direct negotiation with Twilio for 30 days.
Disputes must be arbitrated through CAM in Mexico City under Mexican arbitration procedures, with both parties paying equal shares of costs.
+ 2 more obligation changes. Full breakdown available with Watcher.
Track changes →Twilio removed Mexico from its standard global arbitration venue structure and established Mexico-specific dispute resolution requiring good faith negotiation prior to arbitration under CAM rules. The change also includes explicit language excluding Mexican consumer protection law (LFPC) applicability. Organizations using Twilio services in Mexico should evaluate whether this carve-out of consumer protection law impacts their own compliance obligations if they are classified as consumers under Mexican law. The exclusion language may face enforceability challenges depending on how Mexican courts interpret consumer protection exemptions in commercial agreements. Compliance teams should clarify Twilio's classification of their account and confirm whether Mexican consumer protection law may apply despite contractual exclusion language.
Mexican Federal Consumer Protection Law (LFPC); Mexican arbitration law and enforcement framework for CAM awards
Full compliance analysis
Obligation analysis, escalation trigger, board language, and recommended action.
Watcher: regulatory citations + obligations. Professional: full compliance memo.
ConductAtlas provides verified policy intelligence sourced directly from platform documents. All analysis is intended to support, not replace, legal and compliance review. Record CA-C-001814.
See the full side-by-side comparison of every sentence added, removed, and modified.
🔒 Full diff — WatcherTwilio's privacy notice now includes a specific statement that it does not sell personal data to third parties for marketing …
Twilio's Privacy Notice table of contents was updated on May 1, 2026 to add a reference to 'Twilio Messaging Campaign …
Twilio added a new terms document reference to its table of contents on May 1, 2026. The change adds 'Twilio …
Get alerted when this policy changes again — including what changed and why it matters.
Prefer a weekly summary instead?
Get the biggest policy changes across 320+ platforms every Sunday.