Ticketmaster · Ticketmaster Privacy Policy · View original document ↗

Persistent Fraud Profiling Despite Personalization Opt-Out

Medium severity High confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Unique · 0 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Ticketmaster Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

Even if you turn off personalization in your account, Ticketmaster will continue to use your data for profiling activities such as fraud screening, meaning behavioral profiling of your account does not stop entirely.

This analysis describes what Ticketmaster's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

Users who opt out of personalization may reasonably expect all profiling to stop, but the policy clearly states that profiling continues for operational purposes such as fraud prevention, which means your behavioral data is still analyzed by automated systems regardless of your preference settings.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jun 12, 2026

The updated policy establishes that Ticketmaster may collect biometric information in limited circumstances where necessary for service delivery or required by law, with additional safeguards and advance notice. The policy now discloses that event photography and video may be captured and used in marketing materials, with a stated right to object where Ticketmaster controls the filming. Communications may now occur through messaging services in addition to existing channels. These disclosures inform you of practices Ticketmaster may engage in, but operational impact depends on whether and how these practices are implemented in your jurisdiction or event context.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
3
Months Monitored
May 10, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 3350 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 3 months of monitoring.

Change history

modified Jun 12, 2026

Previous 'Profiling and Personalization by Default' provision replaced with more explicit language clarifying that fraud profiling persists even when users opt out of personalization.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Opting out of personalization reduces marketing profiling but does not stop Ticketmaster from analyzing your account behavior for fraud detection purposes, meaning automated profiling of your activity continues regardless of your marketing preferences.

How other platforms handle this

Skillshare Medium

If you are a California resident, you have the right to: Know what personal information is being collected about you; Know whether your personal information is sold or disclosed and to whom; Say no to the sale of personal information; Access your personal information; Request deletion of your person...

Ancestry Medium

Depending on where you live, you may have certain rights with respect to your personal information, such as the right to request access, correction, or deletion of your personal information, or to opt out of the sale or sharing of your personal information. If you are a California resident, you have...

Ledger Medium

At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Ticketmaster has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
By turning personalization off you won't get any personal recommendations and any newsletters you've subscribed to will be generic (although if you've asked to receive alerts about specific artists or venues, you'll still receive these). We will still perform profiling activities where we need to so we can deliver our services to you, for example for fraud screening purposes.

— Excerpt from Ticketmaster's Ticketmaster Privacy Policy

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages GDPR Article 22 on automated decision-making and profiling, and Article 6(1)(f) regarding legitimate interests as a legal basis for processing. The use of profiling for fraud screening without an ability to fully opt out may require a documented legitimate interests assessment. Under CCPA, profiling for fraud prevention may qualify as a service provider exemption from opt-out rights, though this depends on how the relationship with Forter Inc. is structured. GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The disclosure is explicit, which reduces regulatory risk from a transparency standpoint, but the continued profiling after a user-initiated opt-out may generate user complaints or regulatory scrutiny if the scope of ongoing profiling is not clearly bounded or if automated decisions materially affect users such as account suspension based on fraud scores. JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK users have the most material exposure; GDPR Article 22 rights regarding solely automated decisions with significant effects may apply depending on how fraud screening outputs are used operationally. The right to object to legitimate interests processing under GDPR Article 21 is relevant here but may be overridden by compelling legitimate grounds. CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: The explicit naming of Forter Inc. as a third-party fraud screening provider and reference to Forter's own privacy policy indicates a data sharing relationship. Compliance teams should confirm whether Forter is engaged as a data processor under a data processing agreement or as an independent controller, as this affects accountability and audit rights. COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Legal teams should ensure the legitimate interests assessment for fraud profiling is documented and available, that the scope of profiling is proportionate to the fraud prevention purpose, and that any automated decision-making with significant effects on users triggers appropriate disclosure and human review mechanisms under applicable law.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has jurisdiction over consumer protection concerns related to the adequacy and accuracy of disclosures about ongoing profiling practices in the US.
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

CCPA/CPRA
California, USA
Connecticut Data Privacy Act Amendments
US-CT
CAN-SPAM
United States Federal
FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal
GDPR
European Union
Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act
US-IN
Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act
US-KY
Universal Opt-Out Mechanism Expansion 2026
US

Provision details

Document information
Document
Ticketmaster Privacy Policy
Entity
Ticketmaster
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-009648
Document ID
CA-D-00284
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
8406dcc3b484b0b5387215d3e265aa8ceea34fb8652b6bd41fda247862767ac0
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 09:42 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Ticketmaster
Document: Ticketmaster Privacy Policy
Record ID: CA-P-009648
Captured: 2026-05-08 09:42:51 UTC
SHA-256: 8406dcc3b484b0b5…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/ticketmaster/ticketmaster-privacy-policy/persistent-fraud-profiling-despite-personalization-opt-out/
Accessed: June 30, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Ticketmaster's Persistent Fraud Profiling Despite Personalization Opt-Out clause do?

Users who opt out of personalization may reasonably expect all profiling to stop, but the policy clearly states that profiling continues for operational purposes such as fraud prevention, which means your behavioral data is still analyzed by automated systems regardless of your preference settings.

How does this clause affect you?

Opting out of personalization reduces marketing profiling but does not stop Ticketmaster from analyzing your account behavior for fraud detection purposes, meaning automated profiling of your activity continues regardless of your marketing preferences.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Ticketmaster?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ticketmaster.