This analysis describes what Loom's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
If Customer's use of the Service or Deliverable results (or in Snowflake's opinion is likely to result) in an infringement claim, Snowflake may either: (a) substitute functionally similar products or services; (b) procure for Customer the right to continue using...
this Section 14 states the parties' sole and exclusive remedy under this Agreement for any third-party allegations of Intellectual Property Rights infringement covered by this Section 14.
Neither party will have obligations or liability under this Section 7.2 arising from infringement by combinations of the Services or Your Content, as applicable, with any other product, service, software, data, content or method.
"Atlassian may, at its option: (a) procure rights for Customer's continued use of the Products, (b) replace or modify the alleged infringing portion of the Products...or (c) terminate the affected Subscription Term and refund...Excerpt from Loom's Atlassian Customer Agreement
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “Atlassian may, at its option: (a) procure rights for Customer's continued use of the Products, (b) replace or modify the alleged infringing portion of the Products...or (c) terminate the affected Subscription Term and refund...”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loom.