This analysis describes what Loom's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Customer provides PlanetScale: (i) prompt written notice of the Infringement Claim to support@planetscale.com, (ii) exclusive control over the defense and settlement of the Infringement Claim
The party seeking indemnity...must give the other party...the following: (i) prompt written notice of any claim...,(ii) all cooperation and assistance reasonably requested by the Indemnitor in the defense of the claim...and (iii) sole control over the defense and settlement of the claim...
provided that Customer promptly notifies Supabase in writing of the claim, cooperates with Supabase, and allows Supabase sole authority to control the defense and settlement of such claim
"sufficient notice of the Infringement Claim so as to not prejudice Atlassian's defense of the Infringement ClaimExcerpt from Loom's Atlassian Customer Agreement
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The clause states: “sufficient notice of the Infringement Claim so as to not prejudice Atlassian's defense of the Infringement Claim”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Loom.