Provision record
Coursera · Coursera Terms of Use · View original document ↗

Limitation of Liability

Medium severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 287 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Coursera and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

The agreement limits Coursera's liability to exclude indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, including loss of data, profits, or revenues, arising from platform use, third-party conduct on the platform, content obtained from the platform, or unauthorized access to user data. This limitation applies to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.

This analysis describes what Coursera's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Coursera in the event of platform failures, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party misconduct on the platform. The carve-out for applicable law means the limitation may not apply in full in jurisdictions that restrict such exclusions for consumer contracts.

Interpretive note: The enforceability of consequential damages exclusions against consumers varies significantly by jurisdiction, particularly in EU/EEA and UK markets, and depends on the specific nature of the claim.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 3, 2026

The updated refund policy establishes a new condition under which Coursera may deny refund requests: when a significant portion of the course content has been accessed prior to submitting the refund request. This addition does not replace existing denial grounds such as policy violations, repeated refund requests, or chargeback activity, but adds an access-based threshold alongside them. The terms do not define what constitutes a significant portion of content, leaving that determination to Coursera's discretion. Learners who access substantial course materials before requesting a refund may find their request denied under this provision.

View change record →
Medium Jun 30, 2026

The updated terms establish new procedural requirements for refunds on Coursera subscription plans. According to the revised language, canceling a subscription will stop future billing but will not automatically issue a refund; refunds must be requested separately. The terms now explicitly state that refunds will not be provided for renewal charges on annual subscription plans. For Specializations purchased through subscriptions, users may request a full refund within the applicable 7-day refund period or before earning a certificate, whichever occurs first. You can request a refund separately through Coursera's Support Services, but the updated terms indicate this is a manual process rather than an automatic one upon cancellation.

View change record →
High May 27, 2026

The updated terms no longer specify refund eligibility for users in India who prepay for specializations or Coursera Plus plans. Previously, these customers could request full refunds within 7 days of payment or before earning a certificate for any course included in their purchase, whichever occurred first. The removal of this language means refund terms for Indian prepaid customers are no longer explicitly defined in the publicly stated agreement, leaving refund policies unclear for this user segment.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
4
Months Monitored
Apr 18, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 4261 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 4 months of monitoring.

Change history

modified May 21, 2026

Current version adds 'INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY DEFAMATORY, OFFENSIVE OR ILLEGAL' content as specific examples of third-party conduct covered by liability exemption.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Under this clause, Coursera's financial exposure for platform-related harms is limited to direct damages only, excluding consequential, indirect, or punitive damages arising from service outages, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party conduct. The agreement states this limitation applies to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.

How other platforms handle this

ActiveCampaign Medium

If you knowingly misrepresent that any activity or material on our Services is infringing, you may be liable to ActiveCampaign for certain costs and damages.

Leonardo AI Medium

A party's liability for any Liability under these Terms will be reduced proportionately to the extent the relevant Liability was caused or contributed to by the actions (or inactions) of the other party...

Netflix Medium

The Netflix service and/or some of the Netflix content may not be available at any time as a result of events beyond our reasonable control...we will not be held liable should such events occur.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, COURSERA SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, OR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUES, WHETHER INCURRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, OR ANY LOSS OF DATA, USE, GOODWILL, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES, RESULTING FROM (A) YOUR ACCESS TO OR USE OF OR INABILITY TO ACCESS OR USE THE SERVICES; (B) ANY CONDUCT OR CONTENT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE SERVICES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY DEFAMATORY, OFFENSIVE OR ILLEGAL CONDUCT OF OTHER USERS OR THIRD PARTIES; (C) ANY CONTENT OBTAINED FROM THE SERVICES; OR (D) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS, USE OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR CONTENT.

Excerpt from Coursera's Terms of Use

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Limitation of liability clauses in consumer contracts may require evaluation under applicable consumer protection law.

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Coursera Terms of Use
Entity
Coursera
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 21, 2026
Last verified
May 21, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-002849
Document ID
CA-D-00157
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
42a0ca2092790feba474b1bf37dd084c785270106c298fa05ed87685c6d226d0
Analysis generated
May 21, 2026 02:40 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Coursera
Document: Coursera Terms of Use
Record ID: CA-P-002849
Captured: 2026-05-21 02:40:47 UTC
SHA-256: 42a0ca2092790feb…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/coursera/coursera-terms-of-use/provision/CA-P-002849/limitation-of-liability/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Medium
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Coursera's Limitation of Liability clause do?

This provision limits the categories of damages users may recover from Coursera in the event of platform failures, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party misconduct on the platform. The carve-out for applicable law means the limitation may not apply in full in jurisdictions that restrict such exclusions for consumer contracts.

How does this clause affect you?

Under this clause, Coursera's financial exposure for platform-related harms is limited to direct damages only, excluding consequential, indirect, or punitive damages arising from service outages, data loss, unauthorized access, or third-party conduct. The agreement states this limitation applies to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 287 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Coursera?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Coursera.