Provision record
Comcast · Comcast Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Governing Law and Forum Selection

Low severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 266 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Comcast and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

Pennsylvania law governs this agreement, and any court proceedings (if not arbitrated) must be filed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, regardless of where you live.

This analysis describes what Comcast's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

If a dispute is not resolved through arbitration, the agreement requires you to pursue it in courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which could be a practical barrier for subscribers located in other states.

Interpretive note: Enforceability of the Pennsylvania forum selection clause for non-Pennsylvania residents may be limited by applicable state consumer protection laws; the practical effect of this clause is reduced by the mandatory arbitration provision for most consumer disputes.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium Jul 2, 2026

The updated terms now explicitly prohibit the deployment of AI Agents to access, use, interact with, or take action on Comcast services unless Comcast expressly grants permission. This includes automated activities such as obtaining information, making requests, monitoring activity, copying, downloading, scraping, or data mining the services. The agreement also prohibits AI Agents from accepting terms on a user's behalf or engaging in support or sales interactions. Users who currently use automation tools or third-party integrations with Comcast services may need to seek express permission from Comcast or discontinue such automated access.

View change record →

Clause Stability Mostly Stable

1
Change
5
Months Monitored
May 10, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 1500 other provisions on other platforms.
This clause has changed once in 5 months of monitoring.

Change history

modified Jul 2, 2026

Previous version was a bare provision name with medium severity; current version specifies Pennsylvania law, Philadelphia courts, and explicitly subjects court jurisdiction to arbitration primacy, with severity reduced to low.

View full change record →

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Subscribers outside Pennsylvania who have a court-eligible dispute with Comcast would need to litigate in Philadelphia courts under Pennsylvania law, which could make pursuing smaller claims practically and financially difficult.

How other platforms handle this

Tinder Medium

In the EU and EEA, the choice of Texas governing law shall not apply only where a mandatory consumer protection law explicitly prohibits such choice of law provisions.

Instacart Medium

For any claims that are not subject to arbitration...U.S. Residents: Delaware law; venue exclusively in the state or federal courts in New Castle County, Delaware

Plaid Medium

These Terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and the United States without regard to conflicts of laws provisions

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without giving effect to conflict of laws principles. To the extent that any action proceeds in court rather than arbitration, you consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Excerpt from Comcast's Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Forum selection clauses in consumer contracts are enforceable under federal and most state law but are subject to challenge where they are found to be unreasonably burdensome or contrary to strong state public …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Applicable regulations

FAA
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Comcast Terms of Service
Entity
Comcast
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
April 28, 2026
Last verified
May 10, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-007978
Document ID
CA-D-00343
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
efea3823a102772db3d7d7ea6f90d396e449c64d5193126cb9ae725fe616faba
Analysis generated
April 28, 2026 06:09 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Comcast
Document: Comcast Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-007978
Captured: 2026-04-28 06:09:54 UTC
SHA-256: efea3823a102772d…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/comcast/comcast-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-007978/governing-law-and-forum-selection/
Accessed: Sept. 8, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
Low
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Comcast's Governing Law and Forum Selection clause do?

If a dispute is not resolved through arbitration, the agreement requires you to pursue it in courts located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, which could be a practical barrier for subscribers located in other states.

How does this clause affect you?

Subscribers outside Pennsylvania who have a court-eligible dispute with Comcast would need to litigate in Philadelphia courts under Pennsylvania law, which could make pursuing smaller claims practically and financially difficult.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 266 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Comcast?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Comcast.