Provision record
Atlassian · Atlassian Cloud Terms · View original document ↗

Mandatory Arbitration and Class Action Waiver

High severity Medium confidence Explicit document language Common · 205 of 352 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Atlassian and get the diff the day its terms change.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Document Record

What it is

If you have a dispute with Atlassian, the agreement requires you to resolve it through individual arbitration rather than in court, and you cannot join a class action lawsuit against Atlassian.

This analysis describes what Atlassian's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision requires disputes to proceed through individual arbitration, which means customers cannot bring collective legal actions against Atlassian and must pursue claims individually, potentially at greater cost relative to the value of the claim.

Interpretive note: Enforceability may vary by jurisdiction, particularly for EU/UK customers and in US states with heightened scrutiny of class action waivers.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

The arbitration clause limits customers to individual proceedings for most disputes and waives the right to participate in class or collective actions against Atlassian, which may affect the practical ability to pursue lower-value claims.

What you can do

⚠️ These actions may provide transparency or partial mitigation but may not fully address the underlying issue. Effectiveness varies by jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
  • Opt Out of Arbitration
    Within 30 days
    Review the agreement for any arbitration opt-out provision and deadline. If an opt-out is available, follow the specified method (typically written notice) within the stated timeframe from account creation or agreement acceptance.

How other platforms handle this

Chegg Medium

If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.

Tinder Medium

the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.

Wise Medium

Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
YOU AND ATLASSIAN AGREE THAT ANY DISPUTE, CLAIM OR CONTROVERSY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE BREACH, TERMINATION, ENFORCEMENT, INTERPRETATION OR VALIDITY THEREOF OR THE USE OF THE PRODUCTS (COLLECTIVELY, 'DISPUTES') WILL BE SETTLED BY BINDING ARBITRATION, EXCEPT THAT EACH PARTY RETAINS THE RIGHT TO SEEK INJUNCTIVE OR OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION TO PREVENT THE ACTUAL OR THREATENED INFRINGEMENT, MISAPPROPRIATION OR VIOLATION OF A PARTY'S COPYRIGHTS, TRADEMARKS, TRADE SECRETS, PATENTS, OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.

Excerpt from Atlassian's Cloud Terms

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (regulatory & governance intelligence)

REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and may interact with state consumer protection statutes in California, New Jersey, and New York, where class action waivers in consumer and commercial contracts face …

Insight

Unlock the full institutional analysis

Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.

Applicable agencies

  • Federal Trade Commission (ftc)
    Oversees unfair or deceptive business practices and can investigate companies that mislead consumers about data collection, sharing, or use.
    Who can file: Anyone affected by the company's practices (US or international)
    What you need: Your account details, a timeline of relevant events, and a description of the specific issue
    What to expect: Complaints inform FTC enforcement priorities and investigations but do not result in individual resolution or compensation
    File a complaint →
  • State Attorney General
    State AGs in California, New York, Texas, and other states can investigate violations of state consumer protection and privacy laws, including CCPA (California), SHIELD Act (New York), and equivalents.
    Who can file: Residents of states with comprehensive privacy laws — primarily California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah
    What you need: Evidence of the violation, explanation of how your state rights were affected, and your account or contact information with the company
    What to expect: Outcomes vary by state. May result in investigation, enforcement action, or requirement for the company to change practices. No direct individual compensation in most cases.

    Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form

Provision details

Document information
Document
Atlassian Cloud Terms
Entity
Atlassian
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 8, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-010938
Document ID
CA-D-00707
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
43d2f9eb25e260f7f82440abad02e2eba835af6870815ec9bb7ba9cddb25b8ec
Analysis generated
May 8, 2026 01:00 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Atlassian
Document: Atlassian Cloud Terms
Record ID: CA-P-010938
Captured: 2026-05-08 01:00:52 UTC
SHA-256: 43d2f9eb25e260f7…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/atlassian/atlassian-cloud-terms/provision/CA-P-010938/mandatory-arbitration-and-class-action-waiver/
Accessed: Sept. 23, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the research letter

Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Atlassian's Mandatory Arbitration and Class Action Waiver clause do?

This provision requires disputes to proceed through individual arbitration, which means customers cannot bring collective legal actions against Atlassian and must pursue claims individually, potentially at greater cost relative to the value of the claim.

How does this clause affect you?

The arbitration clause limits customers to individual proceedings for most disputes and waives the right to participate in class or collective actions against Atlassian, which may affect the practical ability to pursue lower-value claims.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Atlassian?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Atlassian.