Passengers who are involuntarily denied boarding have federally mandated compensation rights that American is required to honor; the specific dollar amounts are set by DOT regulation and can be substantial for long delays.
Pika
· Pika Acceptable Use Policy
This provision asserts Pika's authority to disclose user identity and information to law enforcement in response to requests or court orders, and requires users to indemnify Pika against claims arising from such disclosures or related investigations; the enforceability of the indemnification waiver may vary by jurisdiction.
The terms disclaim all warranties on AI-generated outputs and service availability, which places reliance risk entirely on users and is particularly significant for users who use AI outputs in professional, medical, legal, or financial contexts.
For free users, the maximum compensation Mistral AI could owe is 50 euros regardless of the harm caused. This provision significantly limits users' ability to recover financially in the event of a serious failure, though applicable consumer protection laws in some jurisdictions may limit how enforceable such a cap is.
The liability cap defines the maximum financial exposure Duolingo assumes under the service agreement and restricts the categories of compensable harm to direct damages only. This structure allocates risk by excluding indirect and consequential losses from recovery, which are often the largest components of claimed damages in service disruption scenarios.
This provision caps potential developer recovery at 12 months of fees paid, which may be a modest amount for developers on free-tier or low-spend plans. It limits financial recourse in the event of service failures, data incidents, or other breaches regardless of the magnitude of harm experienced.
Cohere
· Cohere SaaS Agreement
Liability caps create predictable cost structures for service providers and define the outer boundary of financial exposure in the event of service failures or breaches. This affects risk allocation between the parties and the economic basis upon which the agreement operates.
Fitbit
· Fitbit Terms of Service
For a platform that collects sensitive health and biometric data, a maximum liability of one hundred dollars is a very low ceiling if a data breach or service failure causes real harm.
This provision significantly limits the financial recourse available to developers who suffer business losses due to API failures, outages, or data incidents, even if those losses are substantially larger than the capped amount.
For businesses with high transaction volumes but relatively low fee rates, the cap may be significantly lower than the actual financial loss caused by a platform outage or processing error.
The liability cap restricts the range of damages Revolut may be required to pay in breach scenarios to direct losses caused by contractual violations, while excluding entire categories of loss from recovery. This allocation establishes the financial scope of Revolut's exposure under the agreement and defines which loss categories fall outside the liability framework.
The liability cap means that regardless of the nature or extent of harm a user experiences in connection with the services, Anthropic's maximum financial exposure to that user is limited to a relatively small dollar amount, which may significantly limit available remedies.
This provision establishes a financial ceiling on Perplexity's liability that is calibrated to historical API spend, which may be substantially lower than the business losses a developer could incur from API failures, data incidents, or service interruptions. This cap directly affects risk transfer analysis for enterprises building revenue-generating or operationally critical applications on the API.
Calm
· Calm Terms of Service
For users who have suffered financial loss, data exposure, or service failure, this cap means Calm's maximum financial exposure to any individual user is effectively US$50 or amounts paid, which may be significantly less than actual damages in many scenarios.
PayPal
· PayPal User Agreement
This clause establishes the operational framework for account cessation, clarifying that termination rights exist independently of liability resolution. The provision ensures PayPal's ability to pursue remedies for account obligations that accrued during the account's active period.
Indeed
· Indeed Terms of Service
For most job seekers who use Indeed for free, this cap means the maximum recovery in any dispute is $100 regardless of the actual harm suffered, including harms from data breaches, wrongful account termination, or missed job opportunities caused by platform failures.
The liability cap limits the financial remedies available to users if Stability AI's service causes harm, and the provision placing responsibility for AI output misuse on users is operationally significant for enterprise deployments.
DeepL
· DeepL Terms and Conditions
This cap can be very low relative to the potential business harm caused by a translation error or service failure, particularly for enterprise customers who rely on DeepL for high-stakes communications.
This clause limits your ability to recover losses beyond the transaction amount even if Wise's error caused broader financial harm, though US law may provide additional protections for certain electronic fund transfer errors that cannot be waived by contract.
This cap means that even if you suffer significant financial or other harm from the platform, your ability to recover damages is limited to a relatively small amount, which may be substantially less than your actual losses.
This provision caps Together AI's financial exposure to users at a fixed maximum equal to twelve months of prior payments or $100, whichever is greater, and excludes categories of damages including consequential and punitive damages. For users with substantial operational dependencies on Together AI's platform, actual losses from service failures or data issues may significantly exceed this cap.
Amazon
· Amazon Conditions of Use
The warranty disclaimer and liability limitation operate together to establish the scope of Amazon's legal responsibility for service performance and user harm. By disclaiming all warranties and excluding liability for all damage categories, the provision defines Amazon's obligations as limited to providing access to the service itself, rather than guaranteeing specific performance outcomes or compensating for losses.
If Ideogram's service causes you significant harm, such as loss of commercially valuable generated content or a data breach, your ability to recover meaningful compensation through the agreement's terms is capped at $100 for free users.
If Perplexity AI's service causes you significant harm, such as through inaccurate AI outputs that lead to financial or reputational damage, the maximum you could recover under these terms is very small, regardless of the actual harm suffered.
DeepL
· DeepL Terms and Conditions
The clause establishes a tiered liability framework that narrows DeepL's exposure for negligence claims based on breach severity and damage type. This structure defines the scope of financial obligations DeepL assumes under the agreement and allocates risk between the parties regarding data loss and operational failures.
This disclaimer allocates risk by specifying that Waze makes no contractual assurances regarding service performance, reliability, or fitness for specific uses. The provision establishes the baseline legal framework governing what Waze warrants to users under the agreement.
The force majeure and legal compliance carve-outs mean Revolut may not compensate you if your account is restricted or a payment fails due to regulatory requirements, even if you suffer a financial loss as a result.
BeReal
· BeReal Terms of Service
The liability limitation establishes the scope of potential damages BeReal may be required to pay in the event of breach or other claims. The provision anchors liability exposure to jurisdictional legal maximums rather than defining a specific monetary cap.
DeepL
· DeepL Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes a ceiling on DeepL's financial exposure per subscriber claim. The clause is conditioned on applicable law, which preserves mandatory statutory liability under German law and may be further modified by consumer protection rules in other jurisdictions. For high-volume API or enterprise users paying significant annual fees, the 12-month payment figure could represent a meaningful cap, while for lower-tier subscribers the EUR 100 floor applies.
OpenAI
· OpenAI EU Terms of Use
This clause establishes the maximum financial exposure OpenAI will bear for claims under the agreement, which defines the scope of recoverable damages in any dispute regardless of the nature or amount of alleged harm. The cap operates as a defined limitation on the service provider's aggregate liability across all potential claim categories.