This warranty disclaimer allocates risk by establishing that Pinterest makes no affirmative representations regarding the condition, performance, or legal status of the Service or its content. This affects the evidentiary and remedial framework available in disputes regarding service defects or content issues.
The warranty disclaimer and liability cap establish the baseline risk allocation between AWS and users. These provisions define what remedies and recourse are available through the service terms if operational or performance issues occur.
SLAs govern what compensation or credits you may receive if Azure services experience downtime, and the specific terms vary by product, meaning some services you use may have stronger or weaker uptime guarantees than others.
This provision disclaims medical applicability of the genetic results, which limits the company's liability for health decisions made on the basis of its reports while also communicating a genuine limitation of the scientific scope of consumer genetic testing.
The disclosure establishes the extent to which customer assets are protected against broker insolvency under federal SIPC requirements. This clarifies the regulatory framework governing account protection and informs customers of coverage boundaries that apply to their holdings.
Stripe
· Stripe Connect Platform Agreement
This provision establishes that all customer-facing commercial obligations, including delivery, refunds, disputes, and consumer protection compliance, rest with the user rather than Stripe, which is relevant to how the user structures their own terms of service and customer liability arrangements.
Pika
· Pika Acceptable Use Policy
This provision asserts that users bear full legal responsibility for the accuracy, quality, legality, and appropriateness of all inputs and outputs, which may have significant implications if AI-generated content infringes third-party rights or causes harm.
Runway
· Runway Terms of Service
This provision delineates Runway's operational role as a connector rather than a contracting party, which defines the scope of the company's legal responsibility for user interactions on the platform. By establishing that relationships are direct between talent and hiring parties, the clause limits Runway's exposure to disputes or performance failures occurring within those relationships.
This provision reflects a DOT-mandated passenger protection; it is one of the few areas where the CoC directly incorporates a specific, enforceable consumer right with a defined time limit.
Consumers and compliance reviewers who only read this page will not encounter the substantive obligations such as arbitration requirements, data sharing permissions, or fee terms that apply to their Verizon service.
This provision allocates data governance responsibility by establishing that MetaMask does not assume liability for or control over data handling by third-party dApp developers. It clarifies the scope of MetaMask's obligations regarding data practices to exclude those occurring at the dApp layer.
The clause allocates responsibility for third-party marketplace models to their respective providers rather than to Replicate, establishing that Replicate's liability excludes all aspects of third-party model performance, security, and operation. This creates a contractual framework where Replicate disclaims responsibility for service interruptions caused by users' non-compliance with third-party terms.
This clause allocates liability risk between Leonardo AI and users by clarifying that Leonardo AI's liability does not extend to independent third-party integrations. This carves out a category of services from Leonardo AI's standard liability framework.
The provision clarifies the operational and legal structure of the service delivery model by defining the scope of Instacart's responsibility and control over third-party performance. This distinction affects liability allocation and the contractual relationships governing service delivery.
This clause allocates operational responsibility by clarifying the legal and contractual relationship between Instacart and service providers. It establishes that Third Party Providers function independently, which affects liability attribution and the scope of Instacart's control over service delivery standards.
The clause establishes a framework under which Shopify acts as a conduit to third-party services without assuming operational oversight or accountability for those services. This allocation of responsibility clarifies that liability for third-party tool performance rests with the third-party provider rather than Shopify.
This provision allocates responsibility for third-party service performance and data handling to the third-party service provider rather than Mistral AI, establishing clear boundaries between Mistral AI's obligations for its own products and services and third parties' obligations for their own systems and operations.
The provision delineates the scope of Mistral AI's operational responsibility by excluding third-party integrations from its liability framework. This establishes a boundary between Mistral AI's accountable service performance and user outcomes dependent on third-party systems over which Mistral AI exercises no control.
This provision allocates all risk and cost associated with third-party service interactions to users, and disclaims Uniswap Labs' liability for third-party service-related losses. Given the integration of third-party DEXs, DEX applications, and data providers into the Interface and Wallet, this disclaimer covers a broad category of interactions that users may encounter during normal product use.
This clause places full financial and legal responsibility for unauthorized account activity on the user rather than the platform, which could result in users being held accountable for fraud or misuse by third parties.
This provision allocates content responsibility to individual users rather than to Hugging Face, establishing a foundational obligation that defines the scope of user liability for platform activity. The clause creates a gatekeeping requirement whereby users must control access to their Accounts to limit exposure to third-party conduct.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
The clause sets baseline behavioral standards that Google enforces through its service terms, establishing grounds for service suspension or termination and creating contractual obligations that bind users during service use.
Stash
· Stash Terms of Use
This clause could expose you to liability for unauthorized transactions on your account if you fail to promptly report a security breach, which is particularly significant for an investment and banking platform where unauthorized trades or transfers could cause large financial losses.
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to users for losses Khan Academy incurs related to user conduct or service usage. This establishes a mechanism by which Khan Academy transfers certain categories of defense costs and damages to users rather than bearing those costs itself.
The indemnification obligation allocates risk by requiring users to assume financial responsibility for legal defense and damages related to their own conduct under the agreement. This establishes a procedural requirement that users pay Scale AI's costs if claims arise from user violations or service use.
This indemnification clause allocates certain litigation and defense costs to users when their conduct gives rise to third-party claims against Groq or its affiliates. The provision establishes a financial obligation structure for defense expenses and related liabilities tied to user conduct.
The indemnification obligation shifts certain legal and financial responsibility to users for claims arising from their account activity or policy violations. This provision establishes a procedural mechanism under which Walmart may require users to cover defense costs and damages in specified circumstances rather than bearing those costs itself.
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial risk to users by obligating them to cover Instacart's defense costs and damages in disputes where user conduct is the basis for third-party claims, thereby establishing user responsibility for certain categories of corporate liability exposure.
Acorns
· Acorns Terms of Service
This indemnification clause establishes a mechanism by which Acorns transfers certain legal and financial defense obligations to users. The clause creates a broad scope of covered claims across four categories: service use, term violations, third-party rights violations, and user content liability. This affects the allocation of legal risk and expense responsibility between the parties.
The indemnification obligation allocates financial and legal responsibility to users for defending the company against third-party claims connected to the user's conduct. This shifts litigation costs and damages exposure related to user violations or service use to the user rather than the company.