Provision Registry

12505 classified provisions across 299 platforms — browse, filter, and compare.

Every clause classified by type, severity, and platform. Updated as policies change.

Start Compliance free trial Track specific clauses across platforms with provision-level alerts.
medium Legal jurisdiction
Walgreens · Walgreens Terms of Use
Requiring users to litigate in Illinois courts creates a practical barrier to legal action for users in other states, as pursuing a claim may require traveling to or hiring attorneys in Illinois.
CA-P-006269 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Upwork · Upwork Terms of Service
This clause requires non-US users and users outside California to litigate in California if any court proceeding is permitted, which can be impractical and costly for most individual users.
CA-P-004574 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Pinterest · Pinterest Terms of Service
For most users outside the EEA and UK, this provision requires disputes to be governed by California law and litigated in San Francisco courts, which may create practical barriers for users in other US states or countries.
CA-P-000703 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Venmo · Venmo User Agreement
The California venue requirement means that users who opt out of arbitration and pursue litigation must do so in California courts, which may be geographically and financially impractical for users in other states.
CA-P-002813 First tracked Apr 18, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Skillshare · Skillshare Terms of Service
The New York governing law clause determines the substantive law applicable to disputes between users and Skillshare, including interpretation of the arbitration provision and any claims not covered by federal law. This choice of law may affect users' ability to invoke consumer protection rights under their home state or country law.
CA-P-012813 First tracked May 21, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Binance.US · Binance.US Terms of Use
The agreement designates California as the governing law and San Francisco courts as the venue for non-arbitrated disputes, which means users outside California must pursue or defend claims in California unless applicable law in their jurisdiction overrides this designation.
CA-P-008760 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Cloudflare · Cloudflare Terms of Use
For users outside the US, and particularly in the EU and UK, a California governing law and arbitration venue clause may conflict with mandatory local consumer protection laws and may make it practically difficult to pursue a claim.
CA-P-003008 First tracked Apr 18, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Discord · Discord Terms of Service
The agreement designates California law as the governing framework and San Francisco County courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitration disputes, which may create practical barriers for users in other states or countries who wish to pursue legal claims.
CA-P-004889 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
MetaMask · MetaMask Terms of Use
The choice of Delaware law may disadvantage users in jurisdictions with stronger consumer protection laws, as it may displace the application of local consumer rights that would otherwise apply to the dispute.
CA-P-007756 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Slack · Slack Terms of Service
Non-US customers and those outside California may face significant practical burdens in pursuing disputes, as they must litigate in San Francisco under California law, which may conflict with their local legal requirements or consumer protections.
CA-P-001011 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Steam · Steam Subscriber Agreement
If you need to take legal action against Valve outside of arbitration, you would generally need to do so in King County, Washington, which may be impractical for users in other states or countries.
CA-P-006079 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Sony PlayStation · PlayStation Terms of Service
The governing law provision determines which state's substantive law applies to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement and which courts have jurisdiction over disputes that are not resolved through arbitration. This is operationally significant for non-California users whose local laws may differ materially.
CA-P-002944 First tracked Apr 18, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Target · Target Terms and Conditions
This provision establishes Minnesota as the governing legal jurisdiction and Hennepin County courts as the venue for non-arbitrated disputes, which may require users located in other states to litigate in Minnesota if they pursue court-based claims. Choice-of-law clauses may be subject to challenge where the selected law conflicts with the mandatory consumer protection rules of the user's home state.
CA-P-006851 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Zillow · Zillow Terms of Use
The clause specifies the legal framework and venue for dispute resolution, establishing Washington law as the substantive law governing the relationship and centralizing litigation in a specific geographic jurisdiction rather than allowing suits in other jurisdictions where users may be located.
CA-P-006688 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Medium · Medium Terms of Service
The choice of law and venue provisions specify the legal framework and jurisdiction applicable to disputes, which determines which courts have authority to hear non-arbitrated claims and which substantive law governs contract interpretation and enforcement.
CA-P-005982 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
TransUnion · TransUnion Terms of Use
The governing law clause designates Illinois law as the substantive framework for interpreting the agreement, while the exclusive jurisdiction clause centralizes all litigation in Chicago courts. This operational structure determines both the legal standards applied to disputes and the specific forum where claims must be adjudicated.
CA-P-004686 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Snowflake · Snowflake Terms of Service
The governing law and exclusive venue clauses determine where and under what legal framework disputes must be litigated, which may create logistical and financial barriers for customers located outside California and may interact with mandatory local law protections in other jurisdictions.
CA-P-011320 First tracked May 12, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Meta · Meta Terms of Service
The exclusive California jurisdiction clause requires users outside California to litigate disputes in California courts, which may be practically prohibitive, though the consumer carve-out acknowledges that local law may apply for individual consumers in some jurisdictions.
CA-P-007083 First tracked May 9, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Walmart · Walmart Terms of Use
The clause establishes the legal framework for interpreting the agreement and designates the procedural mechanism and venue for dispute resolution, which determines how contractual disagreements are addressed and which substantive law applies to the terms.
CA-P-003607 First tracked Apr 27, 2026 Last seen Apr 27, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Stash · Stash Terms of Use
This provision determines the legal framework applicable to interpretation of the agreement and establishes exclusive forum jurisdiction, concentrating dispute resolution in specific New York courts rather than allowing claims in other jurisdictions where either party may be located.
CA-P-000526 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 17, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Twilio · Twilio Terms of Service
This clause determines the substantive law applied to interpret and enforce the agreement and establishes exclusive venue and jurisdiction for any permitted court proceedings, concentrating dispute resolution in a specific geographic location.
CA-P-001324 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Groq · Groq Terms of Use
The clause specifies the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, establishing California as the controlling jurisdiction and San Francisco County courts as the exclusive venue for non-arbitrated claims, which defines the procedural and substantive law applicable to the agreement.
CA-P-004339 First tracked Apr 30, 2026 Last seen Apr 30, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Peacock · Peacock Terms of Use
The selection of governing law determines which state's substantive legal rules apply to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement, establishing New York law as the controlling legal framework regardless of the user's location.
CA-P-001802 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 17, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Comcast · Comcast Terms of Service
The clause establishes the legal framework and forum for dispute resolution, requiring that any court proceedings occur in a specific geographic jurisdiction under a specific state's substantive law, which determines applicable legal standards and procedural rules.
CA-P-001712 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 28, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Patreon · Patreon Terms of Use
Requiring disputes to be litigated in California courts effectively raises the cost and difficulty of pursuing legal action for users located outside California, which may discourage legitimate claims.
CA-P-000967 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Verizon · Verizon Terms of Service
The choice of law and exclusive jurisdiction clause creates a procedural framework that standardizes legal interpretation across disputes and centralizes litigation venue, reducing administrative complexity for dispute resolution administration.
CA-P-005999 First tracked May 8, 2026 Last seen May 8, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Calendly · Calendly Terms of Use
The governing law selection determines which state's substantive law applies to interpretation and enforcement of the agreement. The exclusive forum selection establishes the procedural venue for litigation, requiring parties to litigate disputes in a specific geographic location rather than courts in other jurisdictions.
CA-P-004858 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Gusto · Gusto Terms of Service
The clause designates a specific jurisdiction and governing law for dispute resolution, which determines which courts have authority to hear non-arbitrated claims and which state's substantive law applies to contract interpretation and enforcement.
CA-P-005068 First tracked May 7, 2026 Last seen May 7, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Box · Box Terms of Service
Users outside California who need to pursue legal action against Box face the added burden and expense of litigating in California courts under California law, which may be impractical for individual users or smaller businesses.
CA-P-009299 First tracked May 10, 2026 Last seen May 22, 2026 Compare across platforms →
medium Legal jurisdiction
Reddit · Reddit User Agreement
The governing law and jurisdiction clause determines the substantive legal rules applied to interpret the agreement and establishes the forum in which legal proceedings must be initiated, affecting dispute resolution procedures and applicable statutory frameworks.
CA-P-000721 First tracked Apr 3, 2026 Last seen Apr 10, 2026 Compare across platforms →

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Monitor specific governance provisions across platforms.

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Start free Start Compliance free trial