The clause establishes Anthropic's operational authority to interrupt service access based on security, compliance, legal, or vendor-related conditions, while allocating suspension-related losses to the Customer. This structure allows Anthropic to manage platform integrity and regulatory compliance without financial exposure for suspension consequences.
This clause establishes Scale AI's operational authority to alter service terms and availability conditions unilaterally. It permits discontinuation or access refusal without procedural requirements or advance notification obligations.
The clause establishes that service continuity is not guaranteed and that the company retains unilateral authority to discontinue access without preconditions or procedural requirements, which affects the reliability of access users can depend upon.
The clause establishes a mechanism for prospective term modification without requiring mutual consent. It creates an operational framework where service continuation functions as constructive agreement to amended contractual provisions.
GitHub
· GitHub Terms of Service
This provision establishes GitHub's authority to modify contractual terms without user consent and defines the notice and acceptance mechanism for those modifications. It creates a distinction between material changes (requiring advance notice) and non-material changes (effective through continued use), which determines the timeline and visibility of contractual amendments.
Netflix
· Netflix Account and Content Policies
This clause establishes Netflix's unilateral authority to transfer its contractual position to third parties without requiring user consent or advance notice. The provision operationalizes Netflix's ability to restructure its business relationships through corporate transactions, mergers, or service provider changes.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship between Databricks and users can be modified without negotiation or separate consent. It allocates the authority to amend binding terms exclusively to Databricks rather than requiring mutual agreement to changes.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual obligations between the parties may be altered during the service relationship. It places the modification authority with Snowflake and establishes continued use as the mechanism of assent to changes, rather than requiring affirmative agreement or renegotiation.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which contractual terms governing the service relationship may be changed without requiring mutual agreement or advance notice beyond website posting or email notification. It defines the effective date of modifications and the process by which users are informed of changes.
This clause establishes a mechanism by which the agreement's terms remain subject to modification by Paramount+ without requiring separate mutual assent from users. The operational significance is that the agreement's binding provisions are not fixed and can be changed during the user's tenure.
Fastly
· Fastly Terms of Service
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship between Fastly and users can be unilaterally amended. It conditions continued service access on acceptance of updated terms without requiring affirmative re-consent beyond continued use.
Upwork
· Upwork Terms of Service
This provision establishes the operational mechanism by which Upwork may alter contractual obligations without requiring explicit user consent. It structures agreement modification as an automatic acceptance framework tied to continued service use rather than requiring affirmative agreement to changes.
This provision establishes the mechanism by which the agreement's terms can be updated without mutual consent. It allocates to Groq the authority to alter contractual obligations, subject only to notification requirements and applicable law restrictions.
Yelp
· Yelp Terms of Service
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which the governing agreement may be unilaterally amended without mutual consent. It places the obligation to monitor modifications on the user and conditions continued service access on acceptance of revised terms through continued use rather than affirmative agreement.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism by which Adyen may alter the contractual relationship with merchants, including modification of service terms, fees, obligations, and conditions. The thirty-day notice period creates a defined timeframe during which merchants may review proposed changes prior to their operative date.
This provision establishes the procedural mechanism through which the governing terms can be altered without mutual agreement. The operational significance lies in Mercury's authority to modify service terms on a unilateral basis, with the scope of advance notice dependent on Mercury's own materiality determination.
This clause establishes the mechanism by which the contractual agreement between OpenAI and users can be altered without requiring affirmative re-consent. It places the burden of notice on the provider and ties acceptance to the user's continued service use rather than explicit agreement.
Figma
· Figma Terms of Service
This clause establishes the operational framework for how the agreement can evolve without requiring mutual renegotiation. It creates a unilateral modification mechanism where the service provider can alter contractual terms through notification procedures rather than bilateral consent.
The provision establishes Walmart's unilateral authority to alter the contractual terms governing the service relationship and permits those modifications to take effect through continued user access rather than through affirmative user consent.
This provision establishes the mechanism by which Best Buy may alter the contractual relationship with users. It operates as a condition precedent to continued service access—users who wish to maintain service must either accept modified terms or cease using the platform.
This clause establishes the operational framework by which the agreement's terms may be altered without requiring mutual consent or affirmative re-agreement. It designates notice mechanisms and sets the condition for acceptance of modifications, which governs how the contractual relationship evolves over time.
This clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism that allows the service provider to alter contractual obligations prospectively, with continued service use functioning as affirmative acceptance of modifications absent cancellation.
Twilio
· Twilio Terms of Service
This provision establishes the operational framework under which the contractual relationship may be unilaterally altered by Twilio without requiring affirmative user consent, with notice serving as the primary procedural safeguard. It creates a mechanism where the terms governing service delivery are not fixed but subject to modification at Twilio's discretion.
The provision establishes the mechanism by which the contractual relationship can be modified unilaterally by Dropbox after initial agreement. It creates an operational framework where users must monitor for term changes and where continued service access functions as affirmative consent to modifications.
This clause establishes a unilateral modification mechanism whereby the service provider retains authority to alter contractual terms during the agreement's term, with acceptance triggered by continued use rather than explicit user affirmation.
This clause establishes the operational framework through which the agreement's terms may be altered without requiring mutual consent or affirmative re-acceptance, allowing the service provider to modify contractual obligations on an ongoing basis. The provision defines notice methods and the acceptance mechanism, creating a procedural structure for term amendments throughout the service relationship.
The clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which the agreement terms can be updated without negotiation, and specifies that users' ongoing use of the service operates as affirmative acceptance of amended terms rather than requiring separate opt-in.
The clause establishes a procedure whereby modifications to contractual terms take effect through notice and passive acceptance rather than requiring explicit affirmative consent, which affects the operational stability of the agreement over time.
This clause establishes the procedural mechanism by which the contractual relationship between Public and users can be unilaterally altered. It creates a notice requirement for material modifications but vests determination of materiality exclusively with the service provider, affecting the stability and predictability of contractual obligations.
This provision allocates the authority to amend contractual terms to Checkout.com without requiring affirmative consent from users. It establishes a mechanism whereby the operative terms governing the service relationship may change without mutual negotiation or explicit user approval.