This analysis describes what Twilio's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The updated terms restrict payment methods for high-volume customers: once monthly fees exceed $8,000 (or local currency equivalent), credit card payments are no longer accepted, and all future payments must be made via ACH transfer, wire transfer, or other acceptable bank transfer method. This applies to all fees going forward once the threshold is crossed in any single month. Additionally, Twilio removed its prior commitment that service functionality will not materially decrease; the revised language now states only that services 'may change over time' without specifying limits on how much functionality may be reduced. For customers in Mexico and Brazil, Twilio has established separate regional entities as the contracting party, which may affect dispute resolution and liability frameworks.
View change record →How other platforms handle this
The provisions of this Section 5.2 will supersede any non-disclosure agreement by and between the Parties...that would purport to address the confidentiality and security of Customer Property, and such agreement will have no further force or effect...
These Terms contain the entire agreement between you and OpenAI regarding the Services and, other than any Service-specific terms, supersedes any prior or contemporaneous agreements between you and OpenAI.
If any provisions from this Policy are in conflict with any applicable laws, such provisions will be replaced by provisions of the same purport that reflects the original intention of the provision, to the extent permissible under the applicable laws.
"The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that no adequate remedy may exist at law for an actual or threatened breach of this Section 4.3 and that, in the event of an actual or threatened breach of the provisions of this Section 4.3, the non-breaching party will be entitled to seek immediate injunctive and other equitable relief, without waiving any other rights or remedies available to it.Excerpt from Twilio's Terms of Service
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that no adequate remedy may exist at law for an actual or threatened breach of this Section 4.3 and that, in the event of an actual or threatened breach of the provisions of this Section 4.3, the non-breaching party will be entitled to seek …”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 290 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Twilio.