Twilio · Twilio Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Customer Indemnification of Twilio

High severity Medium confidence Explicitdocumentlanguage Rare · 1 of 343 platforms
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
Monitor governance changes for Twilio Create a free account to receive the weekly governance digest and monitor one platform for governance changes.
Create free account No credit card required.
Document Record

What it is

If someone sues Twilio because of how you used its services or something you did that violated the terms, you are required to pay Twilio's legal costs and any resulting damages.

This analysis describes what Twilio's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

ConductAtlas Analysis

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

This provision transfers significant financial and legal risk to the customer, requiring the customer to cover Twilio's defense costs and liability for claims arising from the customer's use of the platform.

Interpretive note: The scope of 'in any way connected with' is broad and may be subject to judicial interpretation; some jurisdictions limit indemnification for indemnitee's own negligence.

Recent Activity

This document changed recently

Medium May 9, 2026

The updated terms establish a different dispute resolution process for customers domiciled or registered in Mexico. Previously, Mexico was subject to the standard arbitration venue clause routing disputes to San Francisco, California. Under the revised agreement, Mexican customers must first engage in good faith negotiations with Twilio's senior representatives for 30 days; if unresolved, disputes proceed to binding arbitration under Centro de Arbitraje de México (CAM) rules, conducted in English in Mexico City before a sole arbitrator. The agreement also explicitly states that Mexican consumer protection law (Ley Federal de Protección al Consumidor) does not apply to the commercial relationship between the parties. Mexico-domiciled customers should review the updated dispute resolution procedures and understand that consumer protection law carve-out before continuing use.

View change record →
Medium Apr 19, 2026

The updated terms establish two new regional service entities: CISA Telecomunicaciones for Mexico and Teravoz Telecom for Brazil, meaning customers in those jurisdictions will contract with the local entity rather than Twilio Inc. The agreement now permits orders to be placed through Twilio's online self-service purchasing workflow in addition to traditional written order forms, streamlining how purchase terms can be documented. The updated language also removes the prior commitment that Twilio will not materially decrease overall service functionality, replacing it with a general statement that services may change over time without specific protections on functionality levels.

View change record →
Medium Apr 10, 2026

The updated terms now route Twilio service agreements for Mexico and Brazil customers to new regional entities rather than Twilio Inc., which may affect service delivery, dispute resolution venue, and applicable local law. The definition of Order Form was expanded to explicitly include self-service online purchases, clarifying that terms negotiated through Twilio's account interface carry the same contractual weight as traditional executed agreements. The terms also removed language stating that Twilio would not materially decrease overall service functionality, replacing it with a simpler statement that services may change over time, which narrows the operational commitment Twilio makes regarding service stability. You can review the separate agreements that now govern your use based on your regional location.

View change record →

Clause Stability Stable

0
Changes
3
Months Monitored
May 12, 2026
First Seen
May 22, 2026
Last Seen
This clause type exists across 272 other provisions on other platforms.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

Business customers and developers bear full indemnification responsibility for Twilio's legal costs and damages arising from their use of the platform, including claims related to customer content or terms violations, which creates potentially open-ended financial exposure.

How other platforms handle this

HubSpot Medium

Customer will defend, indemnify and hold harmless HubSpot and its officers, directors, employees, agents, licensors and service providers from and against any claims, liabilities, damages, judgments, awards, losses, costs, expenses or fees (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or rel...

Snowflake Medium

Customer will defend Snowflake against any claim, demand, suit, or proceeding made or brought against Snowflake by a third party alleging that Customer Data, or Customer's use of the Services in violation of this Agreement, infringes or misappropriates such third party's intellectual property rights...

Fastly Medium

Customer shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Fastly and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) arising out of or relating to Customer's use of the Services, Cu...

See all platforms with this clause type →

Monitoring

Twilio has changed this document before.

Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.

Start Monitor free trial Or create a free account →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
You will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Twilio and its officers, directors, employees, and agents, from and against any claims, disputes, demands, liabilities, damages, losses, and costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable legal and accounting fees arising out of or in any way connected with (i) your access to or use of the Services, (ii) your Customer Content, or (iii) your violation of these Terms.

— Excerpt from Twilio's Twilio Terms of Service

ConductAtlas Analysis

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: Indemnification clauses of this type are standard in B2B software and API agreements and are generally enforceable under US contract law. However, the scope of indemnification, particularly the phrase 'in any way connected with,' may be subject to interpretation under applicable state law. Regulatory frameworks such as the TCPA create substantial per-violation liability, meaning that customer indemnification obligations could be material in high-volume messaging deployments. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: High. The indemnification obligation is broad and includes coverage for Twilio's officers, directors, employees, and agents. The phrase 'in any way connected with' your use of the services is broad and could encompass claims arising from regulatory non-compliance, third-party content disputes, or end-user harms. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: Some jurisdictions limit the enforceability of overly broad indemnification clauses, particularly where the indemnitee's own negligence or misconduct contributed to the claim. California courts, for example, have scrutinized indemnification provisions that purport to cover indemnitee negligence. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Procurement and legal teams should assess whether the indemnification obligation is appropriately scoped relative to the customer's actual control over use of the services. Enterprise customers may seek to negotiate caps, carve-outs for Twilio's own negligence or misconduct, or mutual indemnification. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Organizations with significant Twilio deployments should ensure they have adequate insurance coverage for potential indemnification obligations, including technology errors and omissions and cyber liability policies. Legal teams should map the indemnification scope against their TCPA compliance posture and end-user consent documentation.

Full compliance analysis

Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.

Track 1 platform — free Try Monitor free for 14 days

Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.

Applicable agencies

  • FTC
    The FTC has authority over unfair or deceptive practices, including claims that may arise from customer use of Twilio for consumer communications that trigger indemnification obligations
    File a complaint →

Applicable regulations

FTC Act Section 5
United States Federal

Provision details

Document information
Document
Twilio Terms of Service
Entity
Twilio
Document last updated
May 5, 2026
Tracking information
First tracked
May 10, 2026
Last verified
May 12, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-011580
Document ID
CA-D-00251
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Content hash (SHA-256)
af03df8d0e0c4e83dcffecbf61c3d39cc654d6677eb69c928c612842ffb5a8fa
Analysis generated
May 10, 2026 14:27 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Snapshot stored   ✓ Hash verified
Citation Record
Entity: Twilio
Document: Twilio Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-011580
Captured: 2026-05-10 14:27:35 UTC
SHA-256: af03df8d0e0c4e83…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/twilio/twilio-terms-of-service/customer-indemnification-of-twilio/
Accessed: June 28, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Severity
High
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Compliance Governance Intelligence

Need to monitor specific governance provisions?

Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.

Arbitration clauses AI governance Data rights Indemnification Retention policies
Start Compliance free trial

Or start with Monitor →

Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Twilio's Customer Indemnification of Twilio clause do?

This provision transfers significant financial and legal risk to the customer, requiring the customer to cover Twilio's defense costs and liability for claims arising from the customer's use of the platform.

How does this clause affect you?

Business customers and developers bear full indemnification responsibility for Twilio's legal costs and damages arising from their use of the platform, including claims related to customer content or terms violations, which creates potentially open-ended financial exposure.

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Twilio?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Twilio.