You cannot band together with other Ticketmaster customers to bring a group lawsuit or class action — every dispute must be pursued individually, which makes it economically impractical to challenge small overcharges or widespread policy violations.
This analysis describes what Ticketmaster's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes a structural limitation on dispute resolution by eliminating the procedural mechanism of class actions. It operates to channel all claims into individual proceedings, which affects how disputes can be aggregated or collectively resolved.
Expanded scope to explicitly cover all products and services sold through Ticketmaster and disputes arising at any time, with enhanced formatting and emphasis via capitalization.
View full change record →This waiver means that even if Ticketmaster overcharges millions of customers by a small amount each — a classic class action scenario — no group of consumers can pool resources to sue collectively, making legal redress practically impossible for low-value individual claims.
How other platforms handle this
If, however, this Class Action Waiver is deemed invalid or unenforceable with respect to a particular Dispute...neither you nor Chegg will be entitled to arbitration of such Dispute.
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"YOU AND TICKETMASTER AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING.Excerpt from Ticketmaster's Terms of Use
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: The class action waiver is enforced under the FAA per Concepcion, 563 U.S.
Enforcement risk, jurisdiction flags, contract triggers, and due diligence action items.
Search "[your state] attorney general consumer complaint" to find your state's direct complaint form
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
This clause establishes a structural limitation on dispute resolution by eliminating the procedural mechanism of class actions. It operates to channel all claims into individual proceedings, which affects how disputes can be aggregated or collectively resolved.
This waiver means that even if Ticketmaster overcharges millions of customers by a small amount each — a classic class action scenario — no group of consumers can pool resources to sue collectively, making legal redress practically impossible for low-value individual claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ticketmaster.