You cannot band together with other Ticketmaster customers to bring a group lawsuit or class action — every dispute must be pursued individually, which makes it economically impractical to challenge small overcharges or widespread policy violations.
This analysis describes what Ticketmaster's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This clause establishes a structural limitation on dispute resolution by eliminating the procedural mechanism of class actions. It operates to channel all claims into individual proceedings, which affects how disputes can be aggregated or collectively resolved.
This waiver means that even if Ticketmaster overcharges millions of customers by a small amount each — a classic class action scenario — no group of consumers can pool resources to sue collectively, making legal redress practically impossible for low-value individual claims.
How other platforms handle this
You and Teachable agree to resolve any disputes through final and binding arbitration, except as set forth under Exceptions to Agreement to Arbitrate below. You also agree that disputes will only be resolved on an individual basis and not as a class, consolidated, or representative action.
Any dispute arising from or relating to the subject matter of these Terms shall be finally settled by arbitration in San Francisco County, California, in accordance with the Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. ("JAMS") then in effect, by ...
WHERE PERMITTED UNDER THE APPLICABLE LAW, YOU AND NETFLIX AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING. Further, where permitted under the applicable law, unless ...
Monitoring
Ticketmaster has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"YOU AND TICKETMASTER AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS OR REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING.— Excerpt from Ticketmaster's Ticketmaster Terms of Use
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK: The class action waiver is enforced under the FAA per Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011) and Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. 497 (2018). California's Discover Bank rule was preempted by Concepcion, but the McGill rule (2017) preserves the right to seek public injunctive relief in arbitration or court, limiting the waiver's scope for UCL/CLRA claims. The FTC Act Section 5 and state UDAP statutes remain relevant enforcement vectors.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This clause establishes a structural limitation on dispute resolution by eliminating the procedural mechanism of class actions. It operates to channel all claims into individual proceedings, which affects how disputes can be aggregated or collectively resolved.
This waiver means that even if Ticketmaster overcharges millions of customers by a small amount each — a classic class action scenario — no group of consumers can pool resources to sue collectively, making legal redress practically impossible for low-value individual claims.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 86 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ticketmaster.