This analysis describes what Microsoft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes Microsoft's internal governance framework for AI development and signals institutional commitment to principle-based AI system design. The public disclosure of the standard contributes to industry transparency regarding responsible AI development practices.
This provision describes Microsoft's adopted framework for developing AI systems but does not establish binding obligations or specific operational requirements for users or consumers. The terms apply as written, with Microsoft retaining discretion to update the standard as its practices evolve.
How other platforms handle this
Apps that generate content using artificial intelligence must ensure the content does not violate these guidelines, including content that is harmful, offensive, or otherwise objectionable. Apps using AI features must clearly indicate when content has been generated by AI. Developers are responsible...
Only models with a post-mitigation score of "medium" or below can be deployed. Only models with a post-mitigation score of "high" or below can be developed further.
Promoting privacy and security, and respecting intellectual property rights.
Monitoring
Microsoft has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Our Responsible AI Standard is a framework for building AI systems according to six principles. It's a living document updated as we learn, and we've shared it publicly to contribute to the conversation about responsible AI development.— Excerpt from Microsoft's Responsible AI
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes Microsoft's internal governance framework for AI development and signals institutional commitment to principle-based AI system design. The public disclosure of the standard contributes to industry transparency regarding responsible AI development practices.
This provision describes Microsoft's adopted framework for developing AI systems but does not establish binding obligations or specific operational requirements for users or consumers. The terms apply as written, with Microsoft retaining discretion to update the standard as its practices evolve.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Microsoft.