Microsoft states it follows six ethical principles when building AI: fairness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability.
This analysis describes what Microsoft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes the institutional standards that govern Microsoft's approach to AI system design, testing, and release. The principles function as operational guideposts for development and deployment decisions across Microsoft's AI products and services.
This provision states the values Microsoft commits to in AI development, including privacy and security protections and fairness considerations, but does not specify mechanisms by which individual users can enforce these commitments against Microsoft.
How other platforms handle this
Promoting privacy and security, and respecting intellectual property rights.
We may use Materials to provide, maintain, and improve the Services and to develop other products and services, including training our models, unless you opt out of training through your account settings. Even if you opt out, we will use Materials for model training when: (1) you provide Feedback to...
THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED 'AS IS.' EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT PROHIBITED BY LAW, WE AND OUR AFFILIATES AND LICENSORS MAKE NO WARRANTIES (EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE) WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICES, AND DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES INCLUDING IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTIC...
Monitoring
Microsoft has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 10 platforms.
"At Microsoft, we have a responsibility to build technology that makes a positive impact on society. We have six AI principles that guide how we develop and deploy AI: fairness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability.— Excerpt from Microsoft's Responsible AI
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The six principles stated here interact with the EU AI Act's requirements for transparency, human oversight, and non-discrimination in high-risk AI systems, as well as GDPR's accountability and data protection by design requirements. The FTC's authority over unfair or deceptive practices is relevant where stated principles diverge from actual product behavior. National AI regulators and data protection authorities in the EU and UK are the primary enforcement authorities. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The principles are stated at a high level of generality without specifying measurable standards or independent verification mechanisms, which creates a gap between stated commitment and demonstrable compliance that may be material in regulatory inquiries or procurement due diligence. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and UK organizations are subject to heightened scrutiny under the EU AI Act and UK AI governance frameworks; organizations deploying Microsoft AI in healthcare or financial services face additional sector-specific fairness and transparency obligations. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Enterprise procurement teams should assess whether these principles are incorporated as binding contractual obligations in Microsoft's enterprise agreements, and whether non-conformance triggers any remedies or audit rights. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should map each stated principle to the specific controls and product-level documentation Microsoft provides, and assess whether those controls satisfy applicable regulatory requirements in their jurisdiction.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Watcher: 10 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Professional Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Professional includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes the institutional standards that govern Microsoft's approach to AI system design, testing, and release. The principles function as operational guideposts for development and deployment decisions across Microsoft's AI products and services.
This provision states the values Microsoft commits to in AI development, including privacy and security protections and fairness considerations, but does not specify mechanisms by which individual users can enforce these commitments against Microsoft.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Microsoft.