This analysis describes what OpenAI's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The clause creates a gating mechanism that ties model advancement and release decisions to quantified risk assessment outcomes, establishing operational constraints on which model versions OpenAI may make available or continue iterating on.
Users interact only with models that meet the specified post-mitigation risk threshold for deployment ("medium" or below). The provision does not directly impose obligations or restrictions on users, but establishes the risk posture of available models.
How other platforms handle this
Our Additional Use Case Guidelines apply to certain other use cases, including consumer-facing chatbots, products serving minors, agentic use, and Model Context Protocol servers.
Google uses this data to provide, improve, and develop Google products, services, and machine-learning technologies, including Google's enterprise products.
We may use your Autocomplete User Content to improve our discriminative machine learning models, which are models that rank or assign scores to code generations in order to understand the boundaries between different sets of code. We will never use your Autocomplete User Content to improve generativ...
Monitoring
OpenAI has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Only models with a post-mitigation score of "medium" or below can be deployed. Only models with a post-mitigation score of "high" or below can be developed further.— Excerpt from OpenAI's GPT-4o System Card (PDF)
How Meta, TikTok, and Supabase restructured governance language across documents, jurisdictions, and consent frameworks through incremental document updates.
How 10 AI platforms describe the use of user data for model training, improvement, and development, based on archived governance provisions.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
The clause creates a gating mechanism that ties model advancement and release decisions to quantified risk assessment outcomes, establishing operational constraints on which model versions OpenAI may make available or continue iterating on.
Users interact only with models that meet the specified post-mitigation risk threshold for deployment ("medium" or below). The provision does not directly impose obligations or restrictions on users, but establishes the risk posture of available models.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI.