Microsoft has an internal standard that its development teams are expected to follow when building AI products, based on its six ethical principles.
This analysis describes what Microsoft's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision articulates Microsoft's internal governance structure for AI development by establishing a documented framework that teams are expected to follow during system development and deployment phases. It creates an institutional standard against which Microsoft's AI practices are measured.
Interpretive note: The Standard's specific requirements, enforcement mechanisms, and scope of application to individual products are not detailed in this public-facing document.
This provision states that Microsoft product teams are expected to follow a set of internal requirements when developing AI systems; it does not state what happens if those requirements are not followed or how affected users can seek recourse.
How other platforms handle this
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Kit shall not be liable for any indirect, incidental, special, consequential or punitive damages, or any loss of profits or revenues, whether incurred directly or indirectly, or any loss of data, use, goodwill, or other intangible losses, resulting ...
We have implemented appropriate technical and organizational security measures designed to protect the security of any Personal Information we process. However, despite our safeguards and efforts to secure your information, no electronic transmission over the Internet or information storage technolo...
THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND 'AS AVAILABLE' WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. GRAMMARLY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICES WILL BE UN...
Monitoring
Microsoft has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
"Our Responsible AI Standard is a framework for building AI systems according to six principles. It's a set of requirements and best practices that our teams are expected to follow as they develop and deploy AI systems.— Excerpt from Microsoft's Responsible AI
1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: The Responsible AI Standard interacts with the EU AI Act's conformity assessment and risk management requirements for high-risk AI systems, and with GDPR's data protection by design obligations. The document does not indicate whether the Standard has been assessed against any external regulatory framework. 2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The Standard is described as an internal framework without disclosed external audit, certification, or independent verification, which may be insufficient to satisfy regulatory conformity requirements in certain jurisdictions. 3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU and EEA organizations deploying Microsoft AI in high-risk categories as defined by the EU AI Act should assess whether the Responsible AI Standard satisfies conformity assessment requirements. US federal agencies and contractors may face additional requirements under emerging executive orders on AI governance. 4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B customers should determine whether Microsoft's Responsible AI Standard is referenced or incorporated in enterprise service agreements and whether it creates any binding obligations on Microsoft toward its customers. 5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should request documentation of how the Standard is implemented in specific products and whether product-level impact assessments are available for review.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision articulates Microsoft's internal governance structure for AI development by establishing a documented framework that teams are expected to follow during system development and deployment phases. It creates an institutional standard against which Microsoft's AI practices are measured.
This provision states that Microsoft product teams are expected to follow a set of internal requirements when developing AI systems; it does not state what happens if those requirements are not followed or how affected users can seek recourse.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 1 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Microsoft.