The policy prohibits developers from using data obtained through the Facebook platform for surveillance purposes, including monitoring individuals, groups, or organizations without their knowledge.
This analysis describes what Meta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision restricts developers from applying Facebook-sourced data, including user identifiers, location signals, and social graph information, to surveillance or monitoring applications, which has direct implications for law enforcement technology vendors, social listening platforms, and security analytics providers.
Interpretive note: The document fragment was substantially truncated; this provision is characterized based on Meta's publicly known Platform Policy structure and the available document context, not direct clause text.
The updated policy removes explicit language stating that 'Your interactions with AIs will be used to improve AI at Meta.' Previously, users accessing the Meta AI support assistant were informed through this policy that their support conversations could be used for AI improvement. The removal of this disclosure language means the updated policy no longer contains this specific statement about data use, though Meta's broader privacy policies may still address AI model training practices elsewhere.
View change record →The updated policy no longer includes language describing the availability of a 24/7 Meta AI support assistant for resolving account, privacy, and login issues. Previously, the policy stated that users could access instant help anytime through this assistant. The removal of this language means the policy no longer commits to providing round-the-clock AI-powered support for these specific account-related problems. Users can no longer reference this policy language as evidence of a support availability guarantee.
View change record →The updated policy removes explicit disclosure that interactions with Meta AI are used to improve Meta's AI systems. The policy previously stated this practice directly; the revised language no longer includes this statement. Under the updated terms, users accessing the policy will see consolidated references to Meta Terms, AI terms, and Privacy Policy rather than separate Meta AI-specific terms, though the Privacy Policy may contain related disclosures about AI training and data use. You can review Meta's Privacy Policy directly to understand how interaction data may be used for AI improvement purposes.
View change record →Under this provision, third-party developers are prohibited from using Facebook platform data, including profile identifiers and social connections, to monitor or surveil users or other individuals, establishing a stated use-limitation that applies to all applications accessing the platform.
How other platforms handle this
At Ledger, earning and maintaining our users' trust is a top priority. That's why we are deeply committed not only to protecting your privacy and securing your personal data, but also to being fully transparent about how we handle it.
If you are located in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, or the United Kingdom, you have the right to access, correct, or erase your personal data; the right to restrict or object to our processing of your personal data; the right to data portability; and, where our processing is based on your...
We use information to enhance the quality, reliability, and/or accuracy of our AI Features by creating, developing, training, testing, improving, and maintaining AI and ML models run by Strava or our service providers. We use aggregated, de-identified data for this purpose. We also use personal info...
Monitoring
Meta has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 25 platforms.
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages with FTC Act Section 5 principles on unfair data practices, and may intersect with GDPR Article 9 restrictions on processing data for monitoring purposes and EU law enforcement data processing directives. The FTC is the primary federal enforcement authority. State AGs in California, Illinois, and New York may also have enforcement jurisdiction depending on the user population affected. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The term 'surveillance' is not defined in the available document text, creating interpretive uncertainty about which developer use cases fall within the prohibition, particularly for legitimate security, fraud detection, or academic research applications. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA developers face heightened exposure because GDPR imposes specific restrictions on automated processing and profiling that may interact with this clause. Developers providing services to law enforcement or government agencies should evaluate whether their use cases are permitted under both this policy and applicable law. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Vendors building analytics, monitoring, or social listening products on top of Facebook platform data should evaluate whether their use cases comply with this prohibition. Contracts with sub-processors who receive platform data should include flow-down restrictions consistent with this clause. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should audit developer use cases to confirm that no platform data flows are used for individual or group monitoring without explicit user consent. Documentation of the legal basis for any data use that could be characterized as monitoring is advisable, particularly for EU-facing products.
Full compliance analysis
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Free: track 1 platform + weekly digest. Monitor: 25 platforms + same-day alerts. No credit card required.
Compliance Governance Intelligence
Need to monitor specific governance provisions?
Compliance includes provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, regulatory mapping, and audit-ready analysis.
Built from archived source documents, structured governance mappings, and historical version tracking.
This provision restricts developers from applying Facebook-sourced data, including user identifiers, location signals, and social graph information, to surveillance or monitoring applications, which has direct implications for law enforcement technology vendors, social listening platforms, and security analytics providers.
Under this provision, third-party developers are prohibited from using Facebook platform data, including profile identifiers and social connections, to monitor or surveil users or other individuals, establishing a stated use-limitation that applies to all applications accessing the platform.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Meta.