Get the weekly research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean. No account.
The policy requires developers to submit their applications for review and obtain Meta's approval before accessing certain categories of user data or platform features beyond basic public information.
This analysis describes what Meta's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
This provision establishes a gatekeeping mechanism by which Meta controls developer access to sensitive data permissions, including friend lists, user activity, and extended profile information, making platform eligibility conditional on Meta's review determination.
Interpretive note: The document fragment was substantially truncated; this provision is characterized based on Meta's publicly known Platform Policy structure rather than directly quoted clause text.
The updated policy removes explicit disclosure that interactions with Meta AI are used to improve Meta's AI systems. The policy previously stated this practice directly; the revised language no longer includes this statement. Under the updated terms, users accessing the policy will see consolidated references to Meta Terms, AI terms, and Privacy Policy rather than separate Meta AI-specific terms, though the Privacy Policy may contain related disclosures about AI training and data use. You can review Meta's Privacy Policy directly to understand how interaction data may be used for AI improvement purposes.
View change record →Under this provision, third-party applications must receive Meta's approval before accessing user data beyond basic profile information, providing a stated layer of oversight over which applications can access sensitive user data categories.
How other platforms handle this
Please take steps to secure your access credentials such as login name and password, and do not share them with anyone.
if you do choose to upload your photograph to our Service, please note that all images must adhere to our App Use Standards which you are required to comply with to use any of the Robinhood Services.
Customer must comply with any additional terms, restrictions, or limitations (e.g., limitations on the total amount of usage) for a promotional offering as described in the corresponding offer terms.
Monitoring
Meta has changed this document before.
Receive same-day alerts, structured change summaries, and monitoring for up to 20 platforms.
(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: This provision engages with GDPR Article 25 data protection by design and by default principles, and FTC Act requirements on reasonable data security and access controls. The review process may also interact with COPPA requirements for apps that could be accessed by minors. Relevant enforcement authorities include EU Data Protection Authorities and the FTC. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The review process is a significant operational dependency for developers, but the criteria, timelines, and appeal mechanisms for platform review decisions are not determinable from the available document fragment, creating uncertainty for compliance planning. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA developers face heightened exposure because GDPR Article 25 requires data protection by design measures that may need to be documented as part of the platform review submission. Developers serving minors face additional scrutiny under COPPA. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: Developers building commercial products on Facebook platform APIs should include platform review timelines and approval dependencies in vendor contracts and project planning. Loss of platform approval may constitute a material change affecting downstream business operations and B2B contracts. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Compliance teams should maintain documentation of all platform review approvals and the specific data permissions granted, and audit regularly to confirm that actual data access practices remain within approved scopes. Any expansion of data use beyond the approved scope requires re-review under the policy.
Regulatory citations, enforcement risk, and due diligence action items.
Provision-level monitoring, governance timelines, and regulatory mapping built from archived source documents and historical version tracking.
This provision establishes a gatekeeping mechanism by which Meta controls developer access to sensitive data permissions, including friend lists, user activity, and extended profile information, making platform eligibility conditional on Meta's review determination.
Under this provision, third-party applications must receive Meta's approval before accessing user data beyond basic profile information, providing a stated layer of oversight over which applications can access sensitive user data categories.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 287 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Meta.