Governing Law and Jurisdiction

What it is

Any legal dispute about your Ledger purchase will be governed by French law and heard by courts in Paris, regardless of where you live.

Why it matters (compliance & governance perspective)

The exclusive jurisdiction clause concentrates dispute resolution authority in a specific geographic forum and legal system, establishing Paris courts as the mandatory venue for all disputes and eliminating the option for users to pursue claims in other jurisdictions.

Consumer impact (what this means for users)

If you have a serious dispute with Ledger that cannot be resolved informally, the terms require it to be handled under French law in Paris, which may be difficult and expensive for customers in other countries to pursue.

Institutional analysis (Compliance & governance intelligence)

(1) REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: EU consumer protection law, specifically Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (Rome I) on the law applicable to contractual obligations, and Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (Brussels I Recast) on jurisdiction, restrict the ability of businesses to deprive EU consumers of the protection of mandatory rules in their country of habitual residence. As a result, an exclusive French jurisdiction clause cannot override the mandatory consumer protections of an EU consumer's home member state. For non-EU consumers (US, UK, Australian), the practical enforceability of the Paris jurisdiction clause depends on local private international law rules. (2) GOVERNANCE EXPOSURE: Medium. The clause is likely enforceable between commercial parties and for non-EU consumers in practice, but may not be enforceable against EU consumers seeking to rely on their home country's mandatory protections. This creates a two-tier enforcement reality that compliance teams should map. (3) JURISDICTION FLAGS: EU/EEA consumers retain access to their home courts for mandatory consumer law claims regardless of this clause. UK consumers post-Brexit may rely on similar protections under UK private international law. US consumers in states with strong consumer protection regimes (California, New York) may find local courts willing to assert jurisdiction notwithstanding this clause, though the outcome is uncertain. (4) CONTRACT AND VENDOR IMPLICATIONS: B2B purchasers contracting under these standard terms will generally be bound by the French jurisdiction clause. Enterprise buyers should seek bespoke contractual arrangements if they require a different governing law or dispute resolution mechanism. The clause does not include an arbitration or mediation step, meaning disputes default to litigation in Paris. (5) COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATIONS: Ledger should ensure that localised versions of these terms (available in French, German, Spanish, and other languages per the document's hreflang tags) do not create inconsistencies in the governing law clause. Legal teams advising non-EU customers should note that pursuing claims in Paris is likely the contractual default, and assess whether local statutory claims provide a more accessible alternative route.

Applicable agencies

Provision details

Other risks in this policy

• Limitation of Liability for Cryptocurrency Losses high
• 14-Day Right of Withdrawal (EU Consumers) low
• Order Cancellation and Refusal Rights low
• Product Warranty Scope and Exclusions medium
• Price and Availability Subject to Change low
• Age Requirement for Purchase low