This analysis describes what AWS's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
How other platforms handle this
Such indemnification obligations shall not apply to any damages to the extent they arise from or relate to (i) combination of the Subscription Services with information, services, materials, or products not supplied by Ramp; (ii) any modification of the Subscription Services...
THIS SECTION 9.1 SETS FORTH XAI'S SOLE LIABILITY AND CUSTOMER'S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO ANY CLAIM OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INFRINGEMENT.
Customer's failure to use any enhancements, modifications, or updates to the CS Service that have been provided by Contentsquare
"Section 7.1 (Indemnification; General) will not apply to the extent the applicable Losses or damages are caused by AWS's gross negligence or willful misconduct.Excerpt from AWS's Customer Agreement
Get the weekly coverage letter
Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.
The clause states: “Section 7.1 (Indemnification; General) will not apply to the extent the applicable Losses or damages are caused by AWS's gross negligence or willful misconduct.”
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 224 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AWS.