SoFi
· SoFi Terms of Service
This provision creates a contractual obligation for users to bear SoFi's legal costs and damages in the event that the user's conduct gives rise to third-party claims or regulatory actions against SoFi, which is operationally relevant for users engaging in complex financial transactions or third-party integrations through the platform.
This clause means you could be personally financially responsible for legal costs Poshmark incurs because of your activity on the platform, including if you unintentionally violate the terms.
This provision creates a financial obligation for users to cover Perplexity's legal costs and damages arising from user conduct or content submissions, including third-party claims. The scope extends to all content submitted through the platform.
Canva
· Canva Terms of Use
This provision establishes that users bear financial responsibility for legal claims brought against Canva arising from the user's conduct, account activity, Terms violations, or user-generated content. The indemnification obligation extends to attorney's fees and applies to activity conducted by any person using the user's account credentials.
This clause means that if a third party sues Duolingo because of something you did on the platform, you could be held responsible for Duolingo's legal defense costs, which could be substantial.
Asana
· Asana Terms of Service
This clause means you could be personally responsible for Asana's legal fees and damages if something you do on the platform results in a lawsuit or claim against the company.
The indemnification clause establishes a mechanism by which Robinhood transfers certain legal and financial defense obligations to the user. This shifts responsibility for defending against specified claims to the user rather than retaining those obligations internally, affecting the allocation of legal risk between the parties.
This indemnification clause allocates legal risk and defense costs to the Customer for claims arising from the Customer's data or service usage, establishing that Snowflake is not responsible for defending itself against such third-party assertions or bearing the financial consequences of resulting judgments.
The indemnification obligation extends to any third-party claims connected to the developer's use of the API, including intellectual property disputes and user-generated content issues, which can create open-ended financial exposure for developers.
The indemnification obligation allocates legal and financial risk to users by requiring them to assume defense costs and damages in specified categories of claims, rather than Verizon bearing those costs. This establishes a procedural mechanism for cost allocation in disputes involving user conduct or content.
DocuSign
· DocuSign Terms and Conditions
This provision shifts significant financial risk to users; if a dispute arises from how you use the service, you may owe DocuSign's legal fees in addition to any other liability.
The agreement states that users bear responsibility for indemnifying Binance.US against claims including attorneys' fees arising from their use of the platform, meaning users could be liable for significant legal costs if their conduct results in third-party claims or regulatory actions against the company.
This clause means that if a third party sues MetaMask because of something you did while using the service, you could be personally responsible for MetaMask's legal bills and any settlement or judgment, even if the outcome is uncertain.
A user indemnification obligation means that if a third party brings a claim against Stability AI based on how a user used the platform, the user may be contractually required to cover Stability AI's legal costs and any resulting liability.
Vercel
· Vercel Terms of Service
This indemnification clause allocates legal defense and liability costs to users for disputes involving their conduct on the platform. It establishes that users bear financial responsibility for defending Vercel against third-party claims related to their service usage or Terms violations.
This clause shifts significant financial risk to users, meaning that if a third party sues ClickUp over something you did or posted on the platform, you may be responsible for ClickUp's defense costs and any resulting liability.
This indemnification clause allocates financial risk by requiring users to cover Whatnot's defense costs and damages in disputes stemming from user actions or alleged violations, rather than Whatnot absorbing these expenses internally.
Replit
· Replit Terms of Service
The indemnification clause requires users to bear Replit's legal costs and damages in claims arising from their use of the platform, which could include claims related to AI-generated code that infringes third-party intellectual property or causes harm to others.
The clause allocates content liability to the user rather than Tinder, establishing that users assume financial responsibility for defending the platform against third-party claims connected to their submissions. This shifts the burden of legal defense and damages recovery away from the platform operator.
Acorns
· Acorns Terms of Service
This indemnification clause establishes a cost-allocation mechanism whereby users assume financial responsibility for legal defense and liability costs incurred by Acorns related to user conduct, shifting certain legal and financial risk from the service provider to the user.
The indemnification clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to users for defending 23andMe against third-party claims connected to user conduct or service use. This establishes that users bear the cost of defense and damages in covered scenarios rather than 23andMe bearing those costs directly.
The indemnification clause establishes a cost-shifting mechanism that allocates liability for third-party claims to users rather than to Dropbox, reducing Dropbox's financial exposure for disputes arising from user activities or content on the platform.
Google
· Google Terms of Service
This clause allocates legal defense costs and liability exposure to users for claims connected to their own violations or unlawful conduct, rather than requiring Google to bear those costs. The provision operates as a cost-shifting mechanism for third-party legal proceedings.
Figma
· Figma Terms of Service
This means that if your use of Figma, your uploaded designs, or a terms violation causes Figma to face a legal claim, you could be held financially responsible for Figma's legal fees and damages.
Wyze
· Wyze Terms of Service
This provision could expose users to significant financial liability, including Wyze's attorney fees, if a third party sues Wyze because of content the user captured or shared through Wyze devices.
Fiverr
· Fiverr Terms of Service
This clause means that if a third party sues Fiverr because of something you did on the platform, you could be responsible for Fiverr's defense costs and any resulting damages, which could be financially significant for individual users.
This clause could expose users to significant financial liability for Zillow's legal costs if their actions on the platform result in third-party claims, which is a substantial financial risk that most users are unlikely to anticipate.
Indemnification obligations can require users to pay DoorDash's legal costs and damages if their conduct causes harm or legal claims against the company; the scope and conditions of this obligation are defined in the full text of Section 17.
Webull
· Webull Customer Agreement
This means individual users, not just businesses, could be responsible for Webull's legal defense costs if a dispute arises from the user's activity on the platform, including alleged regulatory violations.
Grindr
· Grindr Terms of Service
This indemnification clause allocates legal and financial responsibility to users for third-party claims connected to their conduct on the platform, requiring users to cover Grindr's defense costs and any damages awarded in such claims.