Provision record
Zoom · Zoom Terms of Service · View original document ↗

Pre-Arbitration Demand Must Be Individual Only

Common · 197 of 343 platforms
Stay ahead of the changes
Track Zoom and hear on the next check after its terms change. We check daily where we can, and show you where we can't.
Share 𝕏 Share in Share 🔒 PDF
ⓘ

This analysis describes what Zoom's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology

How other platforms handle this

OpenAI

The arbitration will be conducted by a sole arbitrator. The arbitrator will be either a retired judge or an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California.

Credit Karma

The arbitration proceedings, including any exchanged materials, shall be confidential and you and Credit Karma agree to use reasonable efforts to streamline the proceedings

Anyscale

if we make any amendment to this Arbitration Agreement...in the future, that amendment shall not apply to any claim that was filed in a legal proceeding against Anyscale prior to the effective date of the amendment.

See all platforms with this clause type →
▸ View Original Clause Language DOCUMENT RECORD
"
A Pre-Arbitration Demand is only valid when it pertains to, and is on behalf of, a single individual. A Pre-Arbitration Demand brought on behalf of multiple individuals is invalid as to all.

Excerpt from Zoom's Terms of Service

Provision details

Document information
Document
Zoom Terms of Service
Entity
Zoom
Date stated by the document
Aug. 11, 2023
As printed in Zoom’s text (version CA-V-006671), not a ConductAtlas date.
Tracking information
First captured by ConductAtlas
April 19, 2026
Text quoted from version
CA-V-006671, captured Sept. 11, 2026
Record ID
CA-P-068931
Document ID
CA-D-000189
Evidence Provenance
Source URL
Wayback Machine
Archived bytes SHA-256 (version CA-V-006671)
9a39c9255458e0f5b28a376ce7cdc843e27e53e554eb59709612e0615e32d257
Analysis generated
July 9, 2026 05:33 UTC
Methodology
Evidence
✓ Excerpt found in version CA-V-006671, captured Sept. 11, 2026 (checked Oct. 5, 2026)
Citation Record
Entity: Zoom
Document: Zoom Terms of Service
Record ID: CA-P-068931
Version: CA-V-006671
Captured: 2026-09-11 00:30:36 UTC
SHA-256: 9a39c9255458e0f5…
URL: https://conductatlas.com/platform/zoom/zoom-terms-of-service/provision/CA-P-068931/pre-arbitration-demand-must-be-individual-only/
Accessed: Oct. 25, 2026
Permanent archival reference. Stable identifier suitable for legal filings, compliance documentation, and research citation.
Classification
Categories

Other risks in this policy

Related Analysis

Get the weekly coverage letter

Companies change their terms without announcing it. We capture governance documents, compare each new version with the last, and publish what changed, with the source text behind it. One email a week on what we found and what we could not reach.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Zoom's Pre-Arbitration Demand Must Be Individual Only clause do?

The clause states: “A Pre-Arbitration Demand is only valid when it pertains to, and is on behalf of, a single individual. A Pre-Arbitration Demand brought on behalf of multiple individuals is invalid as to all.”

How many platforms have this type of clause?

ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 197 platforms. See the full comparison.

Is ConductAtlas affiliated with Zoom?

No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Zoom.