This analysis describes what Webull's agreement states, permits, or reserves. It does not constitute a legal determination about enforceability. Regulatory applicability and practical outcomes may vary by jurisdiction, enforcement context, and individual circumstances. Read our methodology
The arbitration requirement establishes the procedural framework governing dispute resolution between the parties, directing claims away from the court system and toward an arbitrator. The carve-out for intellectual property injunctions preserves court access for a specific class of claims relating to proprietary rights protection.
Users agree to resolve disputes through binding arbitration, which means claims proceed before an arbitrator rather than in litigation. The arbitration requirement applies to disputes involving contract interpretation, enforcement, breach, and service-related claims, with the exception of intellectual property injunction proceedings.
How other platforms handle this
This Arbitration Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall include any claims brought by or against any third parties, including but not limited to your spouses, heirs, third-party beneficiaries and permitted assigns...
the arbitration provider, National Arbitration and Mediation ("NAM"), shall not accept or administer any demand for arbitration and shall administratively close any arbitration unless the Party bringing such demand for arbitration can certify in writing that the terms...were fully satisfied.
Neither you nor we may elect arbitration of any claims seeking only individualized relief asserted by you or us in small claims court, so long as the action remains in that court and is not removed or appealed de novo...
"You and Webull agree that any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or relating to these Terms or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof or the use of the Services (collectively, 'Disputes') will be settled by binding arbitration, except that each party retains the right to seek injunctive or other equitable relief in a court of competent jurisdiction to prevent the actual or threatened infringement, misappropriation or violation of a party's copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, patents, or other intellectual property rights.Excerpt from Webull's Customer Agreement
Coinbase's User Agreement includes a mandatory arbitration clause that most users may not have reviewed. Here is what the clause states and how the opt-out process works.
561 arbitration provisions across 197 platforms. ConductAtlas tracks how dispute resolution is being restructured across the internet.
Get the research letter
Companies change their terms quietly. We read every version and catch what actually changed. One email a week on the changes that matter and what they mean.
The arbitration requirement establishes the procedural framework governing dispute resolution between the parties, directing claims away from the court system and toward an arbitrator. The carve-out for intellectual property injunctions preserves court access for a specific class of claims relating to proprietary rights protection.
Users agree to resolve disputes through binding arbitration, which means claims proceed before an arbitrator rather than in litigation. The arbitration requirement applies to disputes involving contract interpretation, enforcement, breach, and service-related claims, with the exception of intellectual property injunction proceedings.
ConductAtlas has identified this type of provision across 205 platforms. See the full comparison.
No. ConductAtlas is an independent monitoring service. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Webull.